Reject 116 (expired) #1007

1. 
   ysangkok commented at 4:40 pm on October 11, 2020: contributor

   Expired and superseded by Taproot. @kallewoof @btcdrak @maaku
2. Reject 116 (expired) 0ff26245cf
3. 
   maaku commented at 6:45 am on October 12, 2020: contributor

   Proposal is still relevant as (1) there are use cases which cannot be adequately represented using the fixed-format MAST structure of Taproot, and (2) it provides a quantum-resistant MAST functionality.
4. 
   sipa commented at 10:49 pm on October 12, 2020: member

   I agree this is not superseded by BIP341.
5. maaku cross-referenced this on Oct 16, 2020 from issue bip-0002: allow anyone to inactivate, not reject by kallewoof
6. 
   michaelfolkson commented at 9:20 am on November 16, 2020: contributor

   As not superseded by BIP341 rejecting this is a NACK from me. We shouldn’t get in the habit of rejecting BIPs just because three years have passed since drafting.

   (Waiting on #1016 to clarify rejection rules though.)

7. 
   ysangkok commented at 4:31 pm on November 16, 2020: contributor

   @michaelfolkson the habit of rejecting BIPs just because three years have passed is the current policy, and dozens of BIPs have been rejected for that already. Saying that we shouldn’t follow current policy doesn’t make sense. Are you suggesting we adopt BIP-0002 changes before there is consensus?
8. 
   kallewoof commented at 4:39 pm on November 16, 2020: member

   @michaelfolkson the habit of rejecting BIPs just because three years have passed is the current policy, and dozens of BIPs have been rejected for that already. Saying that we shouldn’t follow current policy doesn’t make sense. Are you suggesting we adopt BIP-0002 changes before there is consensus?

   Once #1016 has been merged, I plan to propose undoing all those rejections, FWIW.

9. 
   ysangkok commented at 4:23 pm on April 23, 2021: contributor

   @kallewoof Now that you’re getting the commit bit, no need to propose it, you can just do it.
10. ysangkok closed this on Apr 23, 2021

    ---

11. 
    kallewoof commented at 4:40 pm on April 23, 2021: member

    For the record, I have no intention of merging any of my own pull requests, unless they’ve been acknowledged by their respective authors, and there is a clear lack of controversy.

Contributors
ysangkok maaku sipa michaelfolkson kallewoof