Add BIP9 assignments #386

1. 
   btcdrak commented at 6:33 am on May 7, 2016: contributor

   Add a place to track various BIP9 deployment proposals.

   As per IRC meeting http://www.erisian.com.au/meetbot/bitcoin-core-dev/2016/bitcoin-core-dev.2016-05-05-19.01.html

2. btcdrak force-pushed on May 7, 2016
3. btcdrak force-pushed on May 7, 2016
4. btcdrak force-pushed on May 7, 2016
5. Add BIP9 assignments b56f7d7b6d
6. btcdrak force-pushed on May 7, 2016
7. 
   dabura667 commented at 11:16 am on May 7, 2016: none

   ACK b56f7d7b6da75a31acfff42a678ed31b0555259f
8. 
   luke-jr commented at 2:13 pm on May 7, 2016: member

   I think it would be better to format this as a table from future to past (rows, each being a year, or quarter-year), and bits (columns). Probably don’t need testnet.
9. Add sorting 6313ee0f3b
10. in bip-0009/assignments.mediawiki: in b56f7d7b6d outdated

    0@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
    1+==Deployments==
    2+
    3+List of proposed deployments.
    4+
    5+State can be defined, active, failed. Dates are in UTC.
    6+
    7+{| class="wikitable"
    

    ---

    ---

    

    MarcoFalke commented at 2:46 pm on May 7, 2016:

    Unfortunately it seems class="wikitable sortable" won’t render on GitHub.

    ---

    

    btcdrak commented at 5:28 pm on May 7, 2016:

    seems to render ok https://github.com/btcdrak/bips/blob/bip9assign/bip-0009/assignments.mediawiki what am I missing?

    ---

    

    MarcoFalke commented at 8:23 pm on May 7, 2016:

    Luke was suggesting to sort the table and the best way to do this would be dynamic. (i.e. adding the sortable keyword). The actual mediawiki parser understands sortable but the github parser does not, I think.

    ---

    

    btcdrak commented at 9:40 pm on May 7, 2016:

    afaic, none of the fancy stuff works on Github rendering. Look at the README.mediawiki for example - it’s got lots of formatting and colours in the markup, but doesnt render.

    ---

    

    luke-jr commented at 9:46 pm on May 7, 2016:

    I’m not suggesting to merely sort it, but to format it in a way that it is clear which bits are used at what times.

    ---

    

    btcdrak commented at 10:11 pm on May 7, 2016:

    That’s slightly complicated since bits will become free earlier than expiry once activated. Maybe we should keep it simple… or simply strikeout the bit once activated?
11. luke-jr added the label Proposed BIP modification on May 10, 2016
12. 
    laanwj commented at 11:41 am on May 12, 2016: member

    ACK, thanks, I was about to do this but you beat me to it by almost a week :)

    I think having testnet in there is fine

13. 
    petertodd commented at 7:04 pm on May 12, 2016: contributor

    ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/386/commits/6313ee0f3bd591a773a0ed7f2e1c7b360206b529
14. 
    btcdrak commented at 6:01 pm on May 31, 2016: contributor

    ping @luke-jr
15. luke-jr merged this on May 31, 2016
16. luke-jr closed this on May 31, 2016

    ---

17. btcdrak deleted the branch on May 31, 2016

Contributors
btcdrak dabura667 luke-jr MarcoFalke laanwj petertodd

Labels
Proposed BIP modification