Update README statuses to match individual BIPs #104

pull gurnec wants to merge 1 commits into bitcoin:master from gurnec:master changing 2 files +8 −8
  1. gurnec commented at 11:59 PM on September 10, 2014: none

    This is intended to be a simple copy edit fix: there are a number of BIPs whose status has been updated in the individual BIP, but whose status has not been updated in the README file.

    Although most of the changes are straightforward, the exact status of BIP15 is a little unclear and may require a bit of additional scrutiny...

  2. Update README statuses to match individual BIPs c2502827c7
  3. schildbach commented at 6:23 AM on September 11, 2014: contributor

    BIP72 is Draft for good. It has not been agreed yet, and actually I'm currently working on an amendment that will hopefully finally reach an agreeable state.

  4. gurnec commented at 2:45 PM on September 11, 2014: none

    BIP72 is Draft for good. It has not been agreed yet,

    This commit is only trying to update the descriptive readme page; the equivalent of fixing some typos. If a normative change to a BIP should be made, it should probably come from a more "official" committer... (it looks like it was @gavinandresen who changed it to Final a few months ago).

  5. gavinandresen commented at 5:00 PM on September 11, 2014: contributor

    @schildbach : is this the issue with supporting bluetooth/NFC ?

    That should be it's own BIP, in my humble opinion, since it extends functionality and isn't some mistake in the existing BIP72. Quoting BIP 1: "The more focused the BIP, the more successful it tends to be."

  6. schildbach commented at 7:08 PM on September 11, 2014: contributor

    It's the issue with the missing trust anchor. I'll submit a PR soon.

    Bluetooth support can go into a different BIP, agreed.

  7. gurnec cross-referenced this on Oct 8, 2014 from issue Updated README statuses with most recent status published to respective ... by soroushjp
  8. laanwj commented at 9:28 AM on October 12, 2014: member

    #108 has been merged now, I think this one overlaps completely, or not?

  9. gurnec commented at 1:48 PM on October 12, 2014: none

    @laanwj Except for the minor mismatch in BIP1, they were identical. Thanks for merging one of them, I do think it helps. As far as I'm concerned, this PR can be closed.

  10. laanwj closed this on Oct 15, 2014


github-metadata-mirror

This is a metadata mirror of the GitHub repository bitcoin/bips. This site is not affiliated with GitHub. Content is generated from a GitHub metadata backup.
generated: 2026-04-14 21:10 UTC

This site is hosted by @0xB10C
More mirrored repositories can be found on mirror.b10c.me