No description provided.
Minor: linking BIPs in BIP9 #1102
pull fresheneesz wants to merge 2 commits into bitcoin:master from fresheneesz:fresheneesz-minor-patch-1 changing 1 files +3 −3-
fresheneesz commented at 6:28 PM on April 12, 2021: contributor
-
Minor: linking BIPs in BIP9 cda85c75c1
-
sipa commented at 10:04 PM on April 13, 2021: member
ACK cda85c75c176ebeba4152a238998b4c54aa74e89
-
MarcoFalke commented at 5:29 AM on April 14, 2021: member
Shouldn't relative links be used? Otherwise, regardless of where this is hosted, all links lead to GitHub.
-
fresheneesz commented at 10:11 AM on April 14, 2021: contributor
I do think relative links should be used. However for some reason markdown wasn't working, which confused TF out of me. Checking other BIPs, full URLs were used. Since I don't understand the bracket-link-text-bracket format of the links (and my attempts to put relative urls in there failed), I gave up and did it the old way with absolute URLs.
-
MarcoFalke commented at 12:18 PM on April 14, 2021: member
This is not markdown syntax, it is mediawiki syntax. IIRC relative links are
[[foo]] -
Changing BIP links in BIP9 to relative urls. 593324754f
-
fresheneesz commented at 6:54 PM on April 14, 2021: contributor
Ohh, like wikipedia. I'm familiar with that.
[[link|text]]actually. I updated. - luke-jr added the label Proposed BIP modification on Apr 22, 2021
- luke-jr merged this on Apr 22, 2021
- luke-jr closed this on Apr 22, 2021
Contributors