This PR contains some minor updates to BIP-119 that clarify
- Deployment params
- CTV v.s. Anyprevout
- Synergies with other softforks
- The choice of SHA-256 v.s. RIPEMD
- The choice of Untagged hash vs tagged
This PR contains some minor updates to BIP-119 that clarify
cc @ajtowns
224 | +NEVER_ACTIVE/NO_TIMEOUT, but this is subject to change while the BIP is a draft. 225 | 226 | -For the avoidance of unclarity, the parameters are: 227 | +For the avoidance of unclarity, the parameters to be determined are: 228 | 229 | + // Deployment of CTV (BIP 119)
Indentation is off
637 | Older wallet software will be able to accept spends from OP_CHECKTEMPLATEVERIFY outputs, but will 638 | require an upgrade in order to treat PayToBareDefaultCheckTemplateVerifyHash chains with a confirmed ancestor as 639 | being "trusted" (i.e., eligible for spending before the transaction is confirmed). 640 | 641 | + 642 | +
Don't think you need 3 newlines here.
fixed these both in a followup commit rather than fixup as i noticed some other extra/missing whitespace.
Some nits. Feel free to ignore.
misery uniform fall chuckle sense rather tissue goat pepper fee plunge skull
gh pr checkout 1215