[0112] fix broken link #1276

1. 
   katesalazar commented at 12:24 pm on January 24, 2022: contributor
2. [0112] fix broken link 729a2e388b
3. 
   MarcoFalke commented at 12:34 pm on January 24, 2022: member

   Is there any value in linking to a BIP 9 draft, when there is already a link to the actual BIP 9?
4. 
   katesalazar commented at 12:44 pm on January 24, 2022: contributor

   I’m not interested in proposing a change to this document, but I will applaud it.

   On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 1:34 PM MarcoFalke @.***> wrote:

   Is there any value in linking to a BIP 9 draft, when there is already a link to the actual BIP 9?

   — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/1276#issuecomment-1020053734, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AMRS4W36UXCG5ETCTZBEYXDUXVBOVANCNFSM5MVHJXBQ . Triage notifications on the go with GitHub Mobile for iOS https://apps.apple.com/app/apple-store/id1477376905?ct=notification-email&mt=8&pt=524675 or Android https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.github.android&referrer=utm_campaign%3Dnotification-email%26utm_medium%3Demail%26utm_source%3Dgithub.

   You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.***>

5. 
   kallewoof commented at 10:18 pm on January 24, 2022: member

   For historical posterity? Doesn’t seem very important, but we should address broken links. Perhaps that link should simply be removed.
6. in bip-0112.mediawiki:391 in 729a2e388b

   387@@ -388,7 +388,7 @@ Thanks to Eric Lombrozo and Anthony Towns for contributing example use cases.
   388 
   389 [http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-August/010396.html Softfork deployment considerations]
   390 
   391-[https://gist.github.com/sipa/bf69659f43e763540550 Version bits]
   392+[https://web.archive.org/web/20210925124425/https://gist.github.com/sipa/bf69659f43e763540550 Version bits]
   

   ---

   ---

   

   devnullada commented at 8:20 am on March 31, 2022:

   0[https://web.archive.org/web/20210925124425/https://gist.github.com/sipa/bf69659f43e763540550 Version bits]
   

7. 
   luke-jr commented at 2:58 pm on May 5, 2022: member

   @btcdrak @maaku @CodeShark
8. luke-jr added the label Proposed BIP modification on May 5, 2022
9. 
   katesalazar commented at 8:11 pm on May 5, 2022: contributor

   luke-jr added the Proposed BIP modification label 5 hours ago

   I was trying to avoid being labeled Proposed BIP modification…

10. 
    luke-jr commented at 9:38 pm on May 5, 2022: member

    That makes no sense.
11. 
    maaku commented at 7:24 am on May 6, 2022: contributor

    Approve.

    Sent from my mobile device; please excuse typos and brevity.

    On May 5, 2022, at 7:58 AM, Luke Dashjr @.***> wrote:

     @btcdrak @maaku @CodeShark

    — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe. You are receiving this because you were mentioned.

12. kallewoof merged this on May 6, 2022
13. kallewoof closed this on May 6, 2022

    ---

Contributors
katesalazar MarcoFalke kallewoof devnullada luke-jr maaku

Labels
Proposed BIP modification