BIP Full-RBF deployment schedule #165

pull petertodd wants to merge 3 commits into bitcoin:master from petertodd:bip-full-rbf-deadline changing 1 files +97 −0

petertodd commented at 5:02 AM on June 29, 2015: contributor

No description provided.
First draft 540e30bdfc
petertodd force-pushed on Jun 29, 2015
luke-jr commented at 5:38 AM on June 29, 2015: member

RBF is policy and is therefore n/a to the BIP process.
petertodd commented at 5:45 AM on June 29, 2015: contributor

@luke-jr Not all BIP's are about consensus-critical things, e.g. your own BIP19
wording b8faf48b27
Change mailing list links to new archive 1b1000b631
in bip-full-rbf-deadline.mediawiki:None in 540e30bdfc outdated
```
  25 | +let the wider Bitcoin community use the blockchain more efficiently, supporting
  26 | +more transactions per second in less blockchain space.
  27 | +
  28 | +While full-RBF does allow users to "undo" transactions after they have been
  29 | +sent, the ability of decentralized wallets to protect users from double-spends
  30 | +has proven to be near-zero.(3) Centralized services have had some success in
```
dabura667 commented at 9:41 AM on June 29, 2015:

Elaborate on how it is proven to be near-zero. This is an important point that deserves its own section imho, just just a reference to a mail (you sent, by the way) on the mailing list.

Even copy-pasting the contents of your mail + formatting would be much better.

petertodd commented at 11:42 PM on June 29, 2015:

I should do up a full writeup on this and post it to reddit...
petertodd commented at 9:59 PM on September 5, 2015: contributor

closing, no consensus
petertodd closed this on Sep 5, 2015
ajtowns referenced this in commit 2a738c6956 on Dec 11, 2019

Contributors

petertodd

luke-jr

dabura667