As it is valid to use pk(musig(...)) or pkh(musig(...)) inside taproot scripts, I think the invalid examples might otherwise be misinterpreted.
BIP390: Clarify that musig cannot be used in top-level pk() or pkh() #1696
pull bigspider wants to merge 1 commits into bitcoin:master from bigspider:bip390-nit changing 1 files +2 −2-
bigspider commented at 10:15 AM on November 8, 2024: contributor
-
Clarify that musig cannot be used in top-level pk() or pkh() 2e8f6ba5e7
-
- bigspider renamed this:
Clarify that musig cannot be used in top-level pk() or pkh()
390: Clarify that musig cannot be used in top-level pk() or pkh()
on Nov 8, 2024 -
achow101 commented at 4:44 PM on November 8, 2024: member
ACK 2e8f6ba5e7cd803af3592253334a5230602da159
- jonatack renamed this:
390: Clarify that musig cannot be used in top-level pk() or pkh()
BIP390: Clarify that musig cannot be used in top-level pk() or pkh()
on Nov 8, 2024 - jonatack merged this on Nov 8, 2024
- jonatack closed this on Nov 8, 2024
-
jonatack commented at 4:57 PM on November 8, 2024: member
ACK
- bigspider deleted the branch on Nov 8, 2024
