Update bip-0345.mediawiki #1742

1. 
   Gudnessuche commented at 5:55 pm on January 7, 2025: contributor

   Grammatical errors made to make reading easily digestible.
2. Update bip-0345.mediawiki

   Grammatical errors made to make reading easily digestible.

   9cc8b275ca
3. in bip-0345.mediawiki:84 in 9cc8b275ca

   80@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ Institutional custodians of Bitcoin may use vaults in similar fashion.
   81 
   82 This proposal provides a mitigation to the
   83 [https://web.archive.org/web/20230210123933/https://xkcd.com/538/ "$5 wrench attack."] By
   84-setting the spend delay to, say, a week, and using as the recovery path a
   85+setting the spend delay to, say, a week, and using as the recovery path, a
   

   ---

   ---

   

   jonatack commented at 9:04 pm on January 7, 2025:

   This change doesn’t appear to be grammatically correct.
4. 
   jonatack commented at 9:15 pm on January 7, 2025: member

   Closing, as this pull does not provide sufficient value to be worth valuable and scarce review time, is partially incorrect, and adds unneeded noise for subscribers to this repository and time requests for maintainers of this repository.

   Rather than opening pull requests like this, may I suggest focusing efforts on:

   • Updating already open PRs like #1737 in response to review feedback
   • Opening PRs that provide more value
   • Reviewing PRs by other contributors, which can be the best way to learn, improve, and add value. Please see this article for more information: https://jonatack.github.io/articles/how-to-review-pull-requests-in-bitcoin-core
5. jonatack closed this on Jan 7, 2025

   ---

6. 
   Gudnessuche commented at 8:58 am on January 8, 2025: contributor

   sincerest appreciation @jonatack for sharing your article. I have gone through it, and I must say, it’s really eye opening. Would avoid nits from now on, and keep review more PRs than opening. God bless you.

Contributors
Gudnessuche jonatack