Minor grammatical change #176

pull droark wants to merge 1 commits into bitcoin:master from droark:patch-2 changing 1 files +1 −1
  1. droark commented at 1:41 AM on July 29, 2015: contributor

    The sentence regarding empty byte arrays being used to indicate an invalid ECDSA signature is confusing. I attempted to make it clearer. If I screwed it up or can make it even clearer, please let me know.

    Thank you.

  2. Minor grammatical change
    The sentence regarding allowing empty byte arrays to indicate an invalid ECDSA signature is confusing. I attempted to make it clearer. If I screwed it up or can make it even clearer, please let me know.
    
    Thank you.
    ec575baa55
  3. jonasschnelli commented at 7:02 AM on July 29, 2015: contributor

    Please open trivial, non change PR at trivial next from @theuni: https://github.com/theuni/bitcoin/tree/trivial-next

  4. fanquake commented at 7:05 AM on July 29, 2015: member

    @jonasschnelli This is the bips repo

  5. jonasschnelli commented at 7:06 AM on July 29, 2015: contributor

    Aii.. Ignore my comment then. Sorry.

  6. laanwj commented at 6:40 PM on August 24, 2015: member

    Don't feel strongly about it but "the empty byte array" is strictly correct. There is only one possible empty byte array.

  7. droark commented at 3:54 PM on August 25, 2015: contributor

    @laanwj - Sorry if my comment wasn't totally clear. I mentioned the empty byte array because that was, to me, the most unique phrase in the affected sentence. (Granted, I think "empty byte array" still sounds weird, but I won't rewrite that.) I've highlighted the differences below. In particular, "for with" is definitely a typo.

    Original: "To provide a compact way to deliberately create an invalid signature for with OP_CHECKSIG and OP_CHECKMULTISIG the empty byte array (the result of OP_0) is also allowed."

    Revision: "To provide a compact way to deliberately create an invalid signature for OP_CHECKSIG and OP_CHECKMULTISIG, an empty byte array (i.e., the result of OP_0) is also allowed."

  8. luke-jr commented at 10:49 PM on September 3, 2015: member

    @sipa ACK please, when you get a chance?

  9. sipa commented at 10:50 PM on September 3, 2015: member

    ACK

  10. luke-jr referenced this in commit 7b19058197 on Sep 3, 2015
  11. luke-jr merged this on Sep 3, 2015
  12. luke-jr closed this on Sep 3, 2015

  13. luke-jr referenced this in commit 3a359c8e1e on Jun 6, 2017
  14. pinheadmz referenced this in commit cb1cec770b on Dec 15, 2019

github-metadata-mirror

This is a metadata mirror of the GitHub repository bitcoin/bips. This site is not affiliated with GitHub. Content is generated from a GitHub metadata backup.
generated: 2026-04-14 21:10 UTC

This site is hosted by @0xB10C
More mirrored repositories can be found on mirror.b10c.me