BIP3: Address follow-ups from #1712 #1771

1. 
   murchandamus commented at 6:32 pm on February 21, 2025: contributor

   • Clarifies that a BIP has to be on-topic to be assigned a number
   • Accept phrasing, and punctuation touch-ups from @jonatack’s last review on #1712
2. in bip-0003.md:649 in 1f9e52a0b0 outdated

   645@@ -645,13 +646,13 @@ feedback, and helpful comments.
   646     ready to recommend their BIP for adoption. The term "ready" was also considered, but considered too subjective.
   647 [^rejection]: **Why can proposals remain in Draft or Complete indefinitely?**  
   648     The automatic 3-year timeout of BIPs has led to some disagreement in the past and seems unnecessary in cases where
   649-    the authors are still active in the community and still consider their idea worth pursuing. On the other hand,
   650-    Draft proposals that appear stale may be tested and cleared out after only one year which should achieve the main goal of
   651+    the authors are remain active in the community and still consider their idea worth pursuing. On the other hand,
   

   ---

   ---

   

   jonatack commented at 1:33 am on February 22, 2025:

   0    the authors remain active in the community and still consider their idea worth pursuing. On the other hand,
   

   ---

   

   murchandamus commented at 7:24 pm on February 25, 2025:

   Ah yes, of course. Thanks for catching that.
3. 
   jonatack commented at 1:41 am on February 22, 2025: member

   Looks good, modulo a word to remove.
4. jonatack added the label Proposed BIP modification on Feb 22, 2025
5. murchandamus force-pushed on Feb 25, 2025
6. BIP3: Address follow-ups from #1712 1ceb362897
7. 
   jonatack commented at 7:35 pm on February 25, 2025: member

   ACK 1ceb362897aeb51548a807f6fd5b7731cbc8c83a
8. jonatack merged this on Feb 25, 2025
9. jonatack closed this on Feb 25, 2025

   ---

Contributors
murchandamus jonatack

Labels
Proposed BIP modification