BIP-322: fix proof-of-funds inputs wording #2058

1. 
   kurahin commented at 8:32 pm on December 14, 2025: contributor

   The Signing section previously stated that signers may add additional outputs to to_sign for proving control of funds. This contradicts the Full (Proof of Funds) subsection, which specifies that the claimed UTXOs must be included as additional inputs of to_sign and validated against the current UTXO set, and also conflicts with the requirement that to_sign has exactly one output (an OP_RETURN).
2. BIP-322: fix proof-of-funds inputs wording 80b4b2a6bd
3. 
   jonatack commented at 5:44 pm on December 15, 2025: member

   LGTM, pinging BIP author @kallewoof for yay or nay.
4. murchandamus added the label Proposed BIP modification on Dec 16, 2025
5. murchandamus added the label Pending acceptance on Dec 16, 2025
6. 
   kallewoof commented at 1:40 am on December 17, 2025: contributor

   ACK. Thanks @kurahin.
7. jonatack removed the label Pending acceptance on Dec 17, 2025
8. jonatack merged this on Dec 17, 2025
9. jonatack closed this on Dec 17, 2025

   ---

Contributors
kurahin jonatack kallewoof

Labels
Proposed BIP modification