Formosa as BIP #2108

1. 
   Yuri-SVB commented at 8:16 pm on February 28, 2026: none

   Mnemonic sentences instead of words proposed as forwards- and backwards-compatible expansion to BIP39, itself as Bitcoin Improvement Proposal.
2. Formosa as BIP

   Mnemonic *sentences* instead of words proposed as forwards- and backwards-compatible expansion to BIP39, itself as Bitcoin Improvement Proposal.

   ea51d9b4b1
3. in bip.mediawiki:4 in ea51d9b4b1

   0@@ -0,0 +1,224 @@
   1+<pre>
   2+  BIP: ?
   3+  Layer: Applications
   4+  Title: Formosa --- Themed mnemonic sentences for generating deterministic keys
   

   ---

   ---

   

   murchandamus commented at 7:24 pm on March 2, 2026:

   Title is limited to 50 characters
4. in bip.mediawiki:14 in ea51d9b4b1

    9+  Status: Draft
   10+  Type: Standards Track
   11+  Created: 2021-12-10
   12+  License: BSD-2-Clause
   13+  Requires: BIP-0032, BIP-0039
   14+  Post-History: https://www.toptal.com/cryptocurrency/formosa-crypto-wallet-management
   

   ---

   ---

   

   murchandamus commented at 7:27 pm on March 2, 2026:

   As we are now following BIP3 for the BIP Process, the Preamble is formatted slightly differently:

   0  Authors: Yuri S Villas Boas <yuri@t3infosecurity.com>
   1           André Fidencio Gonçalves <andre7c4@gmail.com>
   2  Status: Draft
   3  Type: Specification
   4  Assigned: ?
   5  License: BSD-2-Clause
   6  Requires: 32, 39
   7  Discussion: https://gnusha.org/pi/bitcoindev/jQqInjh7VTC5byefTzENidJjigvRqf5Y7UvbrWjKPJykvhdlLETeglGE3zoAiVAxUyAXU8uWHsHEjJ0MHqqPTy4prgaIhgMyIrD9c6ZUuE0=@pm.me/#t
   8              https://gnusha.org/pi/bitcoindev/F4cs-RJRQYBXhjoS9fc_cUc93yLrkQS5DNQAeFRHrLEQ5bScCjKSnaqN-IcXb16fxqO053muqFCx8_GzzKN5XCGCIHD9Ir1_baI5voKYfOo=@pm.me/
   9              https://www.toptal.com/cryptocurrency/formosa-crypto-wallet-management
   

5. 
   murchandamus commented at 7:31 pm on March 2, 2026: member

   Hi Yuri, thank you for your submission. I see that your proposal was posted to the mailing list in 2023. Since then, we deployed BIP3 as a new BIP Process, so there are a few formatting changes that would be needed to the preamble. I would also suggest that you add a link to the prior discussion to the Discussion header.

   At first glance, your document appears to be missing a Specification, a Rationale, and a Backwards Compability section. Please refer to BIP3 for more information.

6. murchandamus added the label New BIP on Mar 4, 2026
7. murchandamus added the label PR Author action required on Mar 4, 2026

Contributors
Yuri-SVB murchandamus

Labels
New BIP PR Author action required