Travis: Initial formatting tests #322

1. 
   luke-jr commented at 10:10 pm on February 8, 2016: member

   This needs an admin to actually enable Travis…
2. luke-jr added the label enhancement on Feb 8, 2016
3. luke-jr assigned laanwj on Feb 8, 2016
4. 
   laanwj commented at 0:29 am on February 9, 2016: member

   I’ve enabled travis for this repository
5. luke-jr force-pushed on Feb 9, 2016
6. luke-jr force-pushed on Feb 9, 2016
7. luke-jr force-pushed on Feb 9, 2016
8. luke-jr force-pushed on Feb 9, 2016
9. luke-jr unassigned laanwj on Feb 9, 2016
10. luke-jr assigned luke-jr on Feb 9, 2016
11. luke-jr force-pushed on Feb 9, 2016
12. luke-jr force-pushed on Feb 9, 2016
13. Travis: Initial formatting tests ebf5c28988
14. luke-jr force-pushed on Feb 9, 2016
15. luke-jr referenced this in commit 3cc972c93e on Feb 9, 2016
16. luke-jr merged this on Feb 9, 2016
17. luke-jr closed this on Feb 9, 2016

    ---

18. 
    MarcoFalke commented at 1:55 pm on February 9, 2016: member

    I was planning this as well. Thanks for going forward. Do you think it makes sense to grep for the copyright section as well; Or even add another field for the copyright?
19. 
    luke-jr commented at 8:19 pm on February 9, 2016: member

    That sounds reasonable to me, especially since it’s a common omission.
20. 
    MarcoFalke commented at 6:11 pm on February 13, 2016: member

    Or even add another field for the copyright?

    Adding a field in the header would be the cleanest (and machine-readable) solution, imo. But this would require extending BIP 1?

21. 
    luke-jr commented at 9:00 pm on February 13, 2016: member

    It should be sufficient to add it in BIP 2 IMO.
22. luke-jr deleted the branch on Apr 21, 2017

Contributors
luke-jr laanwj MarcoFalke

Labels
enhancement