Add BIP9 assignments #386

pull btcdrak wants to merge 2 commits into bitcoin:master from btcdrak:bip9assign changing 2 files +41 −0

btcdrak commented at 6:33 AM on May 7, 2016: contributor

Add a place to track various BIP9 deployment proposals.

As per IRC meeting http://www.erisian.com.au/meetbot/bitcoin-core-dev/2016/bitcoin-core-dev.2016-05-05-19.01.html
btcdrak force-pushed on May 7, 2016
btcdrak force-pushed on May 7, 2016
btcdrak force-pushed on May 7, 2016
Add BIP9 assignments b56f7d7b6d
btcdrak force-pushed on May 7, 2016
dabura667 commented at 11:16 AM on May 7, 2016: none

ACK b56f7d7b6da75a31acfff42a678ed31b0555259f
luke-jr commented at 2:13 PM on May 7, 2016: member

I think it would be better to format this as a table from future to past (rows, each being a year, or quarter-year), and bits (columns). Probably don't need testnet.
Add sorting 6313ee0f3b
in bip-0009/assignments.mediawiki:None in b56f7d7b6d outdated
```
   0 | @@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
   1 | +==Deployments==
   2 | +
   3 | +List of proposed deployments.
   4 | +
   5 | +State can be defined, active, failed. Dates are in UTC.
   6 | +
   7 | +{| class="wikitable"
```
MarcoFalke commented at 2:46 PM on May 7, 2016:

Unfortunately it seems class="wikitable sortable" won't render on GitHub.

btcdrak commented at 5:28 PM on May 7, 2016:

seems to render ok https://github.com/btcdrak/bips/blob/bip9assign/bip-0009/assignments.mediawiki what am I missing?

MarcoFalke commented at 8:23 PM on May 7, 2016:

Luke was suggesting to sort the table and the best way to do this would be dynamic. (i.e. adding the sortable keyword). The actual mediawiki parser understands sortable but the github parser does not, I think.

btcdrak commented at 9:40 PM on May 7, 2016:

afaic, none of the fancy stuff works on Github rendering. Look at the README.mediawiki for example - it's got lots of formatting and colours in the markup, but doesnt render.

luke-jr commented at 9:46 PM on May 7, 2016:

I'm not suggesting to merely sort it, but to format it in a way that it is clear which bits are used at what times.

btcdrak commented at 10:11 PM on May 7, 2016:

That's slightly complicated since bits will become free earlier than expiry once activated. Maybe we should keep it simple... or simply ~~strikeout~~ the bit once activated?
luke-jr added the label Proposed BIP modification on May 10, 2016
laanwj commented at 11:41 AM on May 12, 2016: member

ACK, thanks, I was about to do this but you beat me to it by almost a week :)

I think having testnet in there is fine
petertodd commented at 7:04 PM on May 12, 2016: contributor

ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/386/commits/6313ee0f3bd591a773a0ed7f2e1c7b360206b529
btcdrak commented at 6:01 PM on May 31, 2016: contributor

ping @luke-jr
luke-jr merged this on May 31, 2016
luke-jr closed this on May 31, 2016
btcdrak deleted the branch on May 31, 2016

Contributors

Labels

Proposed BIP modification