Spelling: resistance -> resistant #437

pull greglaun wants to merge 4 commits into bitcoin:master from greglaun:patch-1 changing 1 files +1 −1

greglaun commented at 4:10 AM on August 30, 2016: none

I believe it means to say that the Lamport signature is "quantum computing resistant".

Spelling: resistance -> resistant

I believe it means to say that the Lamport signature is "quantum computing resistant".

442ea133d1

luke-jr added the label Proposed BIP modification on Aug 30, 2016
luke-jr commented at 7:12 AM on August 30, 2016: member

@CodeShark @sipa @jl2012
CodeShark commented at 9:01 AM on August 30, 2016: contributor

small nit: "systems", "Lamport signatures", and "witnesses" should be plural, so the sentence should read:

"Examples of new script systems include Schnorr signatures which reduce the size of multisig transactions dramatically, Lamport signatures which are quantum computing resistant, and Merklized abstract syntax trees which allow very compact witnesses for conditional scripts with extreme complexity."

Update bip-0141.mediawiki

Small grammar improvements, and corrected spelling of "Merkelized".

3b2e973cdf

greglaun commented at 2:52 PM on August 30, 2016: none

@CodeShark I agree. I was trying not to be too fussy. I added new commits that make the pluralization uniform. Let me know if you prefer it without the semicolons.

Update bip-0141.mediawiki

"Merklized" was correct before, reverted to previous spelling.

6cce3755b2

Update bip-0141.mediawiki
witness -> witnesses
2d4063755a
murchandamus commented at 6:31 PM on April 23, 2024: contributor

Since this PR has seen no activity since 2016, I interpret that there is not sufficient interest from the authors to merge this change to their BIP.

This PR proposes a minor improvement of the phrasing that seems consistent with the original text. I would be happy to merge either the version that @CodeShark proposed or the one that @greglaun suggested, if @CodeShark, @sipa, or @jl2012 indicated that they would like to proceed that way.

I am closing this PR for now, but please let me know if any of you would like to reopen it.
murchandamus closed this on Apr 23, 2024
murchandamus assigned sipa on Apr 23, 2024
sipa commented at 6:52 PM on April 23, 2024: member

ACK, maybe squash?
murchandamus commented at 7:37 PM on April 23, 2024: contributor

Oh. When I tried to reopen I got the error that "The repository that submitted this pull request has been deleted. I reopened a new PR in #1575.
murchandamus commented at 8:15 PM on April 23, 2024: contributor

Changes adopted via #1575.

Contributors

Labels