Create bip-tkhan-CCVS.mediawiki #494

pull tenakakhan wants to merge 1 commits into bitcoin:master from tenakakhan:patch-2 changing 1 files +82 −0

tenakakhan commented at 8:49 PM on February 10, 2017: contributor

No description provided.
Create bip-tkhan-CCVS.mediawiki f1f817416c

in bip-tkhan-CCVS.mediawiki:None in f1f817416c

   7 | +Comments-URI: TBD
   8 | +Status: Draft
   9 | +Type: Standards Track
  10 | +Created: 2017-02-10
  11 | +License: BSD-2
  12 | +Voting Address: 3CoFA3JiK5wxe9ze2HoDGDTmZvkE5Uuwh8  (just an example, don’t send to this!)

luke-jr commented at 8:53 PM on February 10, 2017:

This header is invalid until the Process BIP is accepted.

in bip-tkhan-CCVS.mediawiki:None in f1f817416c

  51 | +
  52 | +Block #455,629 (~March 4, 2017): Voting ends.
  53 | +
  54 | +==Implementation==
  55 | +
  56 | +Immediately: Announcement will be made on bitcoincore.org calling for any further max block size related BIP submissions by Block #454,477 (~February 24, 2017).

luke-jr commented at 8:54 PM on February 10, 2017:

bitcoincore.org is a private website outside the purview of the BIP process.

in bip-tkhan-CCVS.mediawiki:None in f1f817416c

  53 | +
  54 | +==Implementation==
  55 | +
  56 | +Immediately: Announcement will be made on bitcoincore.org calling for any further max block size related BIP submissions by Block #454,477 (~February 24, 2017).
  57 | +
  58 | +Before Block #454,621: All max block size related BIPs are assigned a bitcoin address for voting. Voting begins. Announcement made on bitcoincore.org.

luke-jr commented at 8:57 PM on February 10, 2017:

Proposing voting on hardforks is in itself a hardfork, so this wouldn't be exclusively a Process BIP. Acceptance of this BIP would require approval from the entire Bitcoin community.

in bip-tkhan-CCVS.mediawiki:None in f1f817416c
```
   0 | @@ -0,0 +1,82 @@
   1 | +<pre>
   2 | +BIP: ?
   3 | +Layer: Process
```
luke-jr commented at 9:01 PM on February 10, 2017:

"Process" is not a layer. This needs to be "Consensus (hard fork)"
luke-jr changes_requested
luke-jr commented at 9:02 PM on February 10, 2017: member

P.S. I discourage even submitting this, as it has already been rejected, and as such it is a waste of everyone's time.
btcdrak commented at 9:11 PM on February 10, 2017: contributor

This proposal has been soundly rejected on the basis of being unworkable, so it really doesnt make sense to publish it.
luke-jr commented at 3:25 PM on April 20, 2017: member

@tenakakhan Please either address the issues or close this.
MarcoFalke commented at 2:15 PM on October 11, 2019: member

Should be closed
luke-jr closed this on Nov 4, 2019

Contributors