Propagate summary tone of BIP Comments to their applicable BIP preambles #500

1. 
   luke-jr commented at 11:30 pm on March 14, 2017: member

   Affects: BIPs 38, 39, 42, 47, 60, 61, 74, 75, 90, 150, 151, 152

   Will merge after a week or so. Anyone who disagrees with the assessments may feel free to post on the Comments wiki and/or this PR by then.

   For reference, BIP 2 specifies how to post comments: https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0002.mediawiki#BIP_comments

2. luke-jr force-pushed on Mar 14, 2017
3. luke-jr force-pushed on Mar 15, 2017
4. 
   jonasschnelli commented at 8:33 am on March 15, 2017: contributor

   ACK for 150, 151
5. luke-jr force-pushed on Mar 15, 2017
6. Propagate summary tone of BIP Comments to their applicable BIP preambles

   Affects: BIPs 38, 39, 42, 44, 47, 60, 61, 74, 75, 90, 150, 151, 152

   d939615535
7. luke-jr force-pushed on Mar 15, 2017
8. 
   jnewbery commented at 5:35 pm on March 15, 2017: member

   NACK. I don’t think this is helpful information.

   EDIT: … by which I mean, anyone could come and add a comment to the wiki discouraging something that is ‘unanimously recommended’, or recommending something that is ‘unanimously discouraged’. The only steady state of the Comments-summary field is ‘Controversial; some recommendation, and some discouragement’

9. 
   btcdrak commented at 6:18 pm on March 15, 2017: contributor

   @jnewbery The process is already detailed by BIP2.
10. luke-jr merged this on Mar 28, 2017
11. luke-jr closed this on Mar 28, 2017

    ---

Contributors
luke-jr jonasschnelli jnewbery btcdrak