I've been triple checking it, since I'm surprised it would stay there for so long unnoticed, but I've become pretty convinced there's a typo in that comment.
(sorry about the separate PR, didn't notice it when I was fixing the dead link)
I've been triple checking it, since I'm surprised it would stay there for so long unnoticed, but I've become pretty convinced there's a typo in that comment.
(sorry about the separate PR, didn't notice it when I was fixing the dead link)
Ah, not the length of the S element itself but the length byte, right, sorry about that.