Add BIP98: Fast Merkle Trees #603

1. 
   maaku commented at 6:53 pm on October 28, 2017: contributor

   This contains the revised draft proposal for BIP98: Fast Merkle Trees, which incorporates all the feedback received so far from the developer mailing list and in-person review. This BIP draft is considered complete by its authors.

   For context, see the following mailing list discussions:

   https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2017-September/014932.html https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2017-September/014935.html https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2017-September/015028.html https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2017-October/015209.html

2. 
   maaku commented at 3:57 am on October 29, 2017: contributor

   From Travis:

   Unknown field License-Code in bip-0098.mediawiki at scripts/buildtable.pl line 167, <$F> line 12.

   License-Code in this BIP is compliant with BIP-2.I think maybe buildtable.pl is in error?

3. 
   luke-jr commented at 4:11 am on October 29, 2017: member

   License-Code in this BIP is compliant with BIP-2.I think maybe buildtable.pl is in error?

   You’re correct.

   This is however missing (above Status):

   0  Comments-Summary: No comments yet.
   1  Comments-URI: https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/wiki/Comments:BIP-0098
   

   Please also add a brief backward compatibility section (saying it isn’t, and should only be used in/for new rules).

   Finally, there should be a simple Copyright section with the full license terms in plain English.

4. luke-jr added the label New BIP on Oct 29, 2017
5. Add 'License-Code' validation to the buildtable script. 566aeeda9e
6. Add BIP98: Fast Merkle Trees 79a2866f42
7. maaku force-pushed on Oct 30, 2017
8. maaku closed this on Oct 30, 2017

   ---

9. 
   luke-jr commented at 4:14 am on October 31, 2017: member

   Why closed?

Contributors
maaku luke-jr

Labels
New BIP