Reject 175 (expired) #960

The rules of BIP-0002 enable me to request this even though I am not the author of the BIP, which is @omarshibli .

It's not clear to me if this is implemented or not?

https://www.newsbtc.com/press-releases/commerceblock-introduces-bip175/

paging @nicosey , @tomt1664 , @tomossomot !

Is this an implementation of BIP-175? commerceblock/mainstay/crypto/tweaking.go

Is it in production, or is it merely experimental? Is the implementation standards conformant? How many users are there?

Hello, It is in production at:

https://mainstay.xyz/

Regards,

On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 7:20 AM Janus Troelsen notifications@github.com wrote:

paging @nicosey https://github.com/nicosey , @tomt1664 https://github.com/tomt1664 , @tomossomot https://github.com/tomossomot !

Is this an implementation of BIP-175? commerceblock/mainstay/crypto/tweaking.go https://github.com/commerceblock/mainstay/blob/a8d57bb668b0cf8f4dcda2fd6d2c9fa845f4acc8/crypto/tweaking.go#L18

Is it in production, or is it merely experimental? Is the implementation standards conformant? How many users are there?

— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/960#issuecomment-678063758, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABYXICCKNR24DHI2XYZ7SS3SBYGZRANCNFSM4PSDRSFQ .

Closing this since it is in use. I think the status should be advanced, but the BIP authors have to request that change, according to BIP-0002 rules.