Hi,
I have faced some confusion among our developers considering this being a fee rate. Would you consider including this tiny doc update?
Best regards,
Jan Capek
Hi,
I have faced some confusion among our developers considering this being a fee rate. Would you consider including this tiny doc update?
Best regards,
Jan Capek
Seems like a sensible addition, nice first contribution thanks :)
utACK c198dc00e1611b43d031920e7f9912fc25a359c3
239 | @@ -240,6 +240,7 @@ UniValue prioritisetransaction(const JSONRPCRequest& request) 240 | "2. dummy (numeric, optional) API-Compatibility for previous API. Must be zero or null.\n" 241 | " DEPRECATED. For forward compatibility use named arguments and omit this parameter.\n" 242 | "3. fee_delta (numeric, required) The fee value (in satoshis) to add (or subtract, if negative).\n" 243 | + " Note, that this value is not a fee rate. It is a value to modify absolute fee of the TX.\n"
Instead of adding a new line, how about improving the description above (which IMO would be enough)?
utACK c198dc00e1611b43d031920e7f9912fc25a359c3