test: add functional test for non-standard bare multisig txs #17541

1. 
   theStack commented at 8:50 PM on November 20, 2019: member

   Approaches another missing functional test of issue #17394 (counterpart to unit test in PR #17502): A transaction is rejected by the mempool with reason "bare-multisig" if any of the outputs' scriptPubKey has bare multisig format (M <PubKey1> <PubKey2> ... <PubKeyN> N OP_CHECKSIG) and bitcoind is started with the argument -permitbaremultisig=0.

2. test: add functional test for non-standard bare multisig txs

   A transaction is rejected by the mempool with reason "bare-multisig" if any of
   the outputs' scriptPubKey has bare multisig format (M <PubKey1> <PubKey2> ...
   <PubKeyN> N OP_CHECKSIG) and bitcoind is started with "-permitbaremultisig=0".

   1be0b1fb2a
3. fanquake added the label Tests on Nov 20, 2019
4. 
   theStack commented at 10:17 AM on January 13, 2020: member

   Since there has been no activity for several weeks: is there anything else I can do for this PR?

5. fanquake requested review from instagibbs on Jan 13, 2020
6. 
   instagibbs commented at 1:36 PM on January 13, 2020: member

   utACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17541/commits/1be0b1fb2adcf95d76f879195564c0bf84162e31

7. kristapsk approved
8. 
   kristapsk commented at 8:03 PM on January 13, 2020: contributor

   ACK 1be0b1fb2adcf95d76f879195564c0bf84162e31

9. MarcoFalke referenced this in commit ec9b964cc9 on Jan 16, 2020
10. MarcoFalke merged this on Jan 16, 2020
11. MarcoFalke closed this on Jan 16, 2020

    ---

12. sidhujag referenced this in commit 6f3eaef555 on Jan 17, 2020
13. sidhujag referenced this in commit 348d49416b on Nov 10, 2020
14. jasonbcox referenced this in commit 34d484f0d9 on Nov 18, 2020
15. theStack deleted the branch on Dec 1, 2020
16. DrahtBot locked this on Feb 15, 2022

Review Requested
instagibbs