Add new getrpcwhitelist call #18822

1. 
   MarcoFalke commented at 10:39 pm on April 29, 2020: member

   For an RPC user it would be nice to be able to discover its whitelist (#12248). A new RPC getrpcwhitelist should be added for that.

   Useful skills:

   Basic understanding of the Bitcoin Core RPC interface, RPC whitelists and our functional test framework

   Want to work on this issue?

   The purpose of the good first issue label is to highlight which issues are suitable for a new contributor without a deep understanding of the codebase.

   You do not need to request permission to start working on this. You are encouraged to comment on the issue if you are planning to work on it. This will help other contributors monitor which issues are actively being addressed and is also an effective way to request assistance if and when you need it.

   For guidance on contributing, please read CONTRIBUTING.md before opening your pull request.

2. MarcoFalke added the label good first issue on Apr 29, 2020
3. 
   brakmic commented at 10:44 pm on April 29, 2020: contributor

   Interesting. Will look into it.
4. 
   promag commented at 1:11 pm on April 30, 2020: member

   Couldn’t we use help fot this?
5. 
   MarcoFalke commented at 1:18 pm on April 30, 2020: member

   I think help should only return static data that can be hosted on a website or pdf
6. 
   laanwj commented at 3:03 pm on April 30, 2020: member

   No, this does not belong in help. It’s not even related to documentation.
7. 
   promag commented at 6:24 pm on April 30, 2020: member

   Not sure if my suggestion was clear, I mean that help would return just the commands the user has access. But agree with Marco.
8. fanquake deleted a comment on Apr 30, 2020
9. fanquake deleted a comment on Apr 30, 2020
10. fanquake deleted a comment on Apr 30, 2020
11. 
    david-bakin commented at 10:35 pm on October 10, 2021: contributor

    Is this still an issue, much less a “good first issue”? Consider that it was addressed twice with PRs (linked) soon after it was raised, both PRs were closed by their author, one after a discussion that there should be a “generic feature discovery” framework, whatever that would be, even though both had gotten some approval comments from some different people. Status of this particular “good first issue” is very unclear to me: Should anyone be encouraged to work on it?
12. MarcoFalke removed the label good first issue on Oct 11, 2021
13. MarcoFalke added the label RPC/REST/ZMQ on Oct 11, 2021
14. 
    MarcoFalke commented at 6:28 am on October 11, 2021: member

    Correct. Good first issues should be uncontroversial and have a clear solution, so I’ve removed the label for now.

Contributors
MarcoFalke brakmic promag laanwj david-bakin

Labels
RPC/REST/ZMQ