build: Ensure source tarball has leading directory name (0.20) #18945
pull laanwj wants to merge 1 commits into bitcoin:0.20 from laanwj:2020_11_0.20_tarball_prefix changing 3 files +3 −3-
laanwj commented at 1:11 pm on May 11, 2020: memberIn the interest of moving 0.20.0 forward and being able to do rc2, extract and backport the non-controversial part from #18818.: ensure that the source tarball has leading directory name.
-
build: Ensure source tarball has leading directory name 59d57f6c10
-
laanwj added the label Build system on May 11, 2020
-
laanwj added this to the milestone 0.20.0 on May 11, 2020
-
laanwj added the label Needs gitian build on May 11, 2020
-
laanwj renamed this:
build: Ensure source tarball has leading directory name
build: Ensure source tarball has leading directory name (0.20)
on May 11, 2020 -
MarcoFalke commented at 1:25 pm on May 11, 2020: member
I think DrahtBot can’t build non-master branches, sorry :sweat_smile:
Maybe @jonasschnelli’s build farm can do?
-
hebasto approved
-
laanwj removed the label Needs gitian build on May 11, 2020
-
laanwj commented at 3:21 pm on May 11, 2020: member
I think DrahtBot can’t build non-master branches, sorry sweat_smile
I’ll try to run my own gitian build.
FWIW, #18909 is also in progress.
Yes, thank you. The reason to open this is that it’s a) trivial b) everyone wants this c) I don’t particularly want to hold up 0.20.0 on people agreeing whether to include the automake cruft or not.
-
laanwj commented at 4:33 pm on May 11, 2020: member
Gitian output:
068a0a4f4728f23985ef937e38622e847fa9f1cae9e25ca8cf75a57cb7d908ffe src/bitcoin-0.20.0rc1.tar.gz
0$ tar -tvf build/out/src/bitcoin-0.20.0rc1.tar.gz |less 1drwxrwxr-x root/root 0 2020-05-11 15:09 bitcoin-0.20.0rc1/ 2-rw-rw-r-- root/root 4692 2020-05-11 15:09 bitcoin-0.20.0rc1/.appveyor.yml 3…
-
Sjors commented at 5:32 pm on May 11, 2020: member
tACK 59d57f6c103100b3fdef59298d57ee8cf4c0b181
068a0a4f4728f23985ef937e38622e847fa9f1cae9e25ca8cf75a57cb7d908ffe src/bitcoin-0.20.0rc1.tar.gz
This extracts to
bitcoin-0.20.0rc1
dir, presumably because it’s based on the 0.20 branch? -
laanwj commented at 2:08 pm on May 12, 2020: member
Yes, this is a fix for 0.20.0, it’s supposed to do that.
We should do a similar thing on master, but the gitian descriptors have been reorganized there (so the solution needs to be slightly different) and there’s not as much hurry.
-
laanwj merged this on May 12, 2020
-
laanwj closed this on May 12, 2020
-
laanwj referenced this in commit f70eb51b05 on Nov 9, 2020
-
sidhujag referenced this in commit a59fbc36ff on Nov 9, 2020
-
UdjinM6 referenced this in commit 5242773943 on Oct 23, 2021
-
UdjinM6 referenced this in commit 94bf922354 on Oct 23, 2021
-
UdjinM6 referenced this in commit 09199e8415 on Dec 4, 2021
-
DrahtBot locked this on Feb 15, 2022
This is a metadata mirror of the GitHub repository bitcoin/bitcoin. This site is not affiliated with GitHub. Content is generated from a GitHub metadata backup.
generated: 2024-11-17 09:12 UTC
More mirrored repositories can be found on mirror.b10c.me