Testnet reset? #19666

issue Tech1k opened this issue on August 5, 2020
  1. Tech1k commented at 3:49 AM on August 5, 2020: contributor

    I was thinking, since it looks like the testnet is very hard to mine and has already had many halvings (I know they are faster). What are your thoughts on a testnet reset for the next release of Bitcoin Core? The testnet I believe should get a refresher as it's been many years since the launch of testnet3 and many altcoins are on testnet4. If you all like this, I'll submit a PR to reset the testnet.

  2. Tech1k added the label Feature on Aug 5, 2020
  3. NicolasDorier commented at 4:57 AM on August 5, 2020: contributor

    I think testnet should be replaced by a signet @kallewoof

  4. Tech1k commented at 5:10 AM on August 5, 2020: contributor

    I think testnet should be replaced by a signet @kallewoof

    I think that would actually be better.

  5. kallewoof commented at 5:41 AM on August 5, 2020: member

    FTR, a few people do like having testnet around (I don't honestly see why, but there you have it).

    Resetting it would remove all those quirky edge cases that we have piled up since last reset, for what it's worth.

  6. Tech1k commented at 6:15 AM on August 5, 2020: contributor

    FTR, a few people do like having testnet around (I don't honestly see why, but there you have it).

    Resetting it would remove all those quirky edge cases that we have piled up since last reset, for what it's worth.

    I run a testnet faucet (https://testnet-faucet.com) and from knowledge, people love to hoard testnet coins. This is also another reason why I think a reset will be good. About those edge cases, all a testnet reset will do is create a new testnet chain from v0.21+. The other testnet will still be accessible from older Bitcoin Core versions, until everyone upgrades.

  7. kallewoof commented at 6:47 AM on August 5, 2020: member

    Right. Question is if it stays that way for very long -- I don't know about testnet v1-2, but I assume (?) they're not syncable anymore.

  8. MarcoFalke commented at 6:53 AM on August 5, 2020: member

    Testnet being large is a feature, see also https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2019-June/017031.html and https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2018-August/016341.html

    If you need/have control over all miners, then a private regtest is an alternative.

    If you need a public network that is more predictable, then signet might be an alternative.

  9. MarcoFalke commented at 6:54 AM on August 5, 2020: member

    Usually the issue tracker is used to track technical issues related to the Bitcoin Core code base. Keep in mind that network-wide consensus and/or P2P changes first need to be discussed with the greater community, e.g. the bitcoin-dev mailing list. Also, they need a BIP to be implemented in Bitcoin Core and other software that connects to the bitcoin P2P network.

  10. MarcoFalke closed this on Aug 5, 2020

  11. MarcoFalke added the label Tests on Aug 14, 2020
  12. DrahtBot locked this on Feb 15, 2022

github-metadata-mirror

This is a metadata mirror of the GitHub repository bitcoin/bitcoin. This site is not affiliated with GitHub. Content is generated from a GitHub metadata backup.
generated: 2026-04-28 06:14 UTC

This site is hosted by @0xB10C
More mirrored repositories can be found on mirror.b10c.me