test: fix misleading fee unit in mempool_limit.py #22972

pull theStack wants to merge 1 commits into bitcoin:master from theStack:202109-test-fix_confusing_fee_calculation_in_mempool_limit changing 1 files +19 −8
  1. theStack commented at 2:08 pm on September 14, 2021: member

    The PR is a follow-up to #22543. The helper send_large_txs in its current interface has a fee_rate parameter, implying that it would create a transaction with exactly that rate. Unfortunately, this fee rate is only passed to MiniWallet’s create_self_transfer method, which can’t know that we append several tx outputs after, increasing the tx’s vsize and decreasing it’s fee rate accordingly.

    In our case, the fee rate is off by several orders of magnitude, as the tx’s vsize changes changes from 96 to 67552 vbytes (>700x), i.e. the value passed to this function is neither really a fee rate nor an absolute fee, but something in-between, which is very confusing. It was suggested to simply in-line this helper as it’s currently only used in this single test (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22543#discussion_r701685136, #22543 (comment)), but I could imagine that this helper may also become useful for other tests and may be moved to a library (e.g. wallet.py) in the future.

    Clarify the interface by passing an absolute fee that is deducted in the end (and also verified, via testmempoolaccept) and also describe how we come up with the value passed. On master, the comment says that the fee rate needs to increased “massively”; this word is also removed because the fee rate only needs to be higher for the test to succeed.

  2. test: fix misleading fee unit in mempool_limit.py
    The helper `send_large_txs` in its current interface has a fee_rate
    parameter, implying that it would create a transaction with exactly that
    rate. Unfortunately, this fee rate is only passed to MiniWallet's
    `create_self_transfer` method, which can't know that we append several
    tx outputs after, increasing the tx's vsize and decreasing it's fee rate
    accordingly.
    
    In our case, the fee rate is off by several orders of magnitude, as the
    tx's vsize changes changes from 96 to 67552 vbytes (>700x), i.e. the
    value passed to this function is neither really a fee rate nor an
    absolute fee, but something in-between, which is very confusing.
    
    Clarify the interface by passing an absolute fee that is deducted in the end
    (and verified, via testmempoolaccept) and also describe how we come up with the
    value passed.
    2600db6c36
  3. Zero-1729 commented at 2:17 pm on September 14, 2021: contributor
    Concept ACK
  4. DrahtBot added the label Tests on Sep 14, 2021
  5. in test/functional/mempool_limit.py:34 in 2600db6c36
    28@@ -23,16 +29,19 @@ def set_test_params(self):
    29         ]]
    30         self.supports_cli = False
    31 
    32-    def send_large_txs(self, node, miniwallet, txouts, fee_rate, tx_batch_size):
    33+    def send_large_txs(self, node, miniwallet, txouts, fee, tx_batch_size):
    34         for _ in range(tx_batch_size):
    35-            tx = miniwallet.create_self_transfer(from_node=node, fee_rate=fee_rate)['tx']
    36+            tx = miniwallet.create_self_transfer(from_node=node, fee_rate=0, mempool_valid=False)['tx']
    


    michaelfolkson commented at 10:18 am on October 4, 2021:
    Should this fee_rate be replaced by fee here too? No, create_self_transfer has a fee_rate argument
  6. michaelfolkson commented at 10:25 am on October 4, 2021: contributor

    Concept ACK

    the value passed to this function is neither really a fee rate nor an absolute fee

    Definitely seems optimal to exclusively use absolute fee and fee rate rather than having some hard to define third variable

  7. stratospher commented at 5:34 pm on October 28, 2021: contributor

    ACK 2600db6.

    This change clarifies the problem with the fee rates in the test.

  8. MarcoFalke merged this on Oct 29, 2021
  9. MarcoFalke closed this on Oct 29, 2021

  10. theStack deleted the branch on Oct 29, 2021
  11. sidhujag referenced this in commit 1d861909f5 on Oct 29, 2021
  12. DrahtBot locked this on Oct 30, 2022

github-metadata-mirror

This is a metadata mirror of the GitHub repository bitcoin/bitcoin. This site is not affiliated with GitHub. Content is generated from a GitHub metadata backup.
generated: 2024-09-29 01:12 UTC

This site is hosted by @0xB10C
More mirrored repositories can be found on mirror.b10c.me