doc: update multisig-tutorial.md to descriptor wallet by default #24519
pull jonatack wants to merge 1 commits into bitcoin:master from jonatack:multisig-tutorial-update changing 1 files +3 −3-
jonatack commented at 11:15 am on March 10, 2022: memberFollow-up to #24281 and #24281 (comment). The default wallet type was changed to descriptor wallets in #23002.
-
fanquake added the label Docs on Mar 10, 2022
-
in doc/multisig-tutorial.md:112 in 4f0573c484 outdated
108@@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ Then import the descriptors created in the previous step using the `importdescri 109 After that, `getwalletinfo` can be used to check if the wallet was created successfully. 110 111 ```bash 112-./src/bitcoin-cli -signet -named createwallet wallet_name="multisig_wallet_01" disable_private_keys=true blank=true descriptors=true 113+./src/bitcoin-cli -signet -named createwallet "multisig_wallet_01" true true
laanwj commented at 11:42 am on March 10, 2022:I like the named syntax better here.true true
doesn’t say much.
jonatack commented at 11:51 am on March 10, 2022:Thanks, I hesitated on this and prefer the named version as well. Done.laanwj commented at 11:43 am on March 10, 2022: memberConcept ACK on removingdescriptors=true
.doc: update multisig-tutorial.md to default wallet type 5347c9732fjonatack force-pushed on Mar 10, 2022laanwj commented at 11:59 am on March 10, 2022: memberRight. In general there is IMO no reason to prefer unnamed to named syntax, or the other way around. Whatever is clearer. In this case, it’s named.
ACK 5347c9732ff24bfcdcd62d0291972c86c80558dc
theStack approvedtheStack commented at 2:13 pm on March 13, 2022: memberConcept and code-review ACK 5347c9732ff24bfcdcd62d0291972c86c80558dc
Slightly related, but certainly not high priority: there are also numerous
createwallet
RPC calls withdescriptors=True
in functional tests that where the explicit parameter could also be omitted on the long-term.michaelfolkson commented at 2:26 pm on March 13, 2022: contributorACK 5347c9732ff24bfcdcd62d0291972c86c80558dc
Improved docs with no need to specify a descriptor wallet given it is default.
there are also numerous createwallet RPC calls with descriptors=True in functional tests that where the explicit parameter could also be omitted on the long-term
Not in scope for this PR but could be omitted in additional PRs now right? Doesn’t need to be long term?
theStack commented at 2:54 pm on March 13, 2022: memberthere are also numerous createwallet RPC calls with descriptors=True in functional tests that where the explicit parameter could also be omitted on the long-term
Not in scope for this PR but could be omitted in additional PRs now right? Doesn’t need to be long term?
Sure, it can be done immediately. I think this task makes a perfect candidate for a good first issue: #24550
achow101 commented at 8:25 pm on March 16, 2022: memberACK 5347c9732ff24bfcdcd62d0291972c86c80558dcachow101 merged this on Mar 16, 2022achow101 closed this on Mar 16, 2022
jonatack deleted the branch on Mar 16, 2022sidhujag referenced this in commit 3163d06a80 on Mar 16, 2022DrahtBot locked this on Mar 16, 2023
This is a metadata mirror of the GitHub repository bitcoin/bitcoin. This site is not affiliated with GitHub. Content is generated from a GitHub metadata backup.
generated: 2024-11-25 15:12 UTC
More mirrored repositories can be found on mirror.b10c.me