Theoretically, a reward for running a full node can be useful to the network. Possibly more people will join efforts and the the network will become stronger. Run a full node 24 hours and 7 days per week, can be expensive (price of electricity, internet and computer available). Why not reward the fullnoders whit Sats?
-
Rom-sp commented at 1:30 AM on August 21, 2022: none
- Rom-sp added the label Feature on Aug 21, 2022
-
MarcoFalke commented at 6:03 AM on August 21, 2022: member
Usually the issue tracker is used to track technical issues related to the Bitcoin Core code base. Network-wide consensus and/or P2P changes first need to be discussed with the greater community, e.g. the
bitcoin-devmailing list. Also, they need a BIP to be implemented in Bitcoin Core and other software that connects to the bitcoin P2P network. - MarcoFalke closed this on Aug 21, 2022
-
ghost commented at 8:48 AM on August 21, 2022: none
No. Running a full node has these benefits:
- No dependency on anyone, like some API and verifying everything.
- Ensuring your privacy because not using someone's node who can track lot of details about your usage.
- Enforcing consensus rules, if an economic node.
-
ghost commented at 8:53 AM on August 21, 2022: none
Run a full node 24 hours and 7 days per week, can be expensive (price of electricity, internet and computer available). Why not reward the fullnoders whit Sats?
I could reward everyone with sats if they were some points I earned for free in a game. Sats is currency and you are basically asking for donations to run nodes. This is something developers can not enforce in this repository, however some users may donate voluntarily.
- fanquake locked this on Aug 21, 2022
Contributors
Labels