#28984 package rbf followups #30295

1. 
   instagibbs commented at 6:36 pm on June 17, 2024: member

   Some suggested nits/changes from #28984
2. 
   DrahtBot commented at 6:36 pm on June 17, 2024: contributor

   The following sections might be updated with supplementary metadata relevant to reviewers and maintainers.

   Code Coverage

   For detailed information about the code coverage, see the test coverage report.

   Reviews

   See the guideline for information on the review process. A summary of reviews will appear here.

3. DrahtBot added the label CI failed on Jun 17, 2024
4. 
   DrahtBot commented at 8:03 pm on June 17, 2024: contributor

   🚧 At least one of the CI tasks failed. Make sure to run all tests locally, according to the documentation.

   Possibly this is due to a silent merge conflict (the changes in this pull request being incompatible with the current code in the target branch). If so, make sure to rebase on the latest commit of the target branch.

   Leave a comment here, if you need help tracking down a confusing failure.

   Debug: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/runs/26330644984

5. instagibbs force-pushed on Jun 17, 2024
6. doc: replace mention of V3 with TRUC de669a883b
7. instagibbs force-pushed on Jun 17, 2024
8. instagibbs renamed this:
   NOMERGE #28984 package rbf followups
   #28984 package rbf followups
   on Jun 17, 2024
9. instagibbs force-pushed on Jun 18, 2024
10. DrahtBot removed the label CI failed on Jun 18, 2024
11. doc: reword package RBF documentation ff4558d441
12. CheckPackageMempoolAcceptResult: touch up error strings adcfd69e44
13. test package rbf boundary conditions more closely cc1770e6fe
14. package rbf: cpfp structure requires package > parent feerate 20187f8487
15. instagibbs force-pushed on Jun 18, 2024

Contributors
instagibbs DrahtBot