These annotations belong in the declarations rather than the definitions. While harmless now, future versions of clang may warn about these.
Discovered these using the upstream WIP: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/67520
These annotations belong in the declarations rather than the definitions. While harmless now, future versions of clang may warn about these.
Discovered these using the upstream WIP: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/67520
These annotations belong in the declarations rather than the definitions.
While harmless now, future versions of clang may warn about these.
The following sections might be updated with supplementary metadata relevant to reviewers and maintainers.
For detailed information about the code coverage, see the test coverage report.
See the guideline for information on the review process.
Type | Reviewers |
---|---|
ACK | instagibbs, maflcko |
If your review is incorrectly listed, please react with 👎 to this comment and the bot will ignore it on the next update.
ACK 5729dbbb7424d02c5e5bc4f2eb340fdc1c0100b4
manually checked that all these annotations still live in the declarations
ACK 5729dbbb7424d02c5e5bc4f2eb340fdc1c0100b4 🦋
Signature:
0untrusted comment: signature from minisign secret key on empty file; verify via: minisign -Vm "${path_to_any_empty_file}" -P RWTRmVTMeKV5noAMqVlsMugDDCyyTSbA3Re5AkUrhvLVln0tSaFWglOw -x "${path_to_this_whole_four_line_signature_blob}"
1RUTRmVTMeKV5npGrKx1nqXCw5zeVHdtdYURB/KlyA/LMFgpNCs+SkW9a8N95d+U4AP1RJMi+krxU1A3Yux4bpwZNLvVBKy0wLgM=
2trusted comment: ACK 5729dbbb7424d02c5e5bc4f2eb340fdc1c0100b4 🦋
3zGDwiYOysORatmPRkyxTlE8MYfUx4FBQyF1scw2iZzTkLsBw9dr84qXRJN1sH/zi6S3X/wAcRlNm5NSORToJBA==
theuni
DrahtBot
instagibbs
maflcko
Labels
Refactoring