wallet: Fix error messages telling user to specify wallet #30912

pull mzumsande wants to merge 1 commits into bitcoin:master from mzumsande:202409_multiwallet_rpc_error changing 2 files +2 −2
  1. mzumsande commented at 9:41 pm on September 16, 2024: contributor

    I’m not very familiar with the wallet and got confused by the error messages

    Wallet file not specified (must request wallet RPC through /wallet/<filename> uri-path). Try adding "-rpcwallet=<filename>" option to bitcoin-cli command line.

    not knowing which filename to put here (some wallet.dat in the wallet’s directory?), when actually, at least for newer wallets, just the wallet name is expected.

  2. wallet: Fix error messages telling user to specify wallet
    It is not clear which file was meant here.
    4b1935ee50
  3. DrahtBot commented at 9:41 pm on September 16, 2024: contributor

    The following sections might be updated with supplementary metadata relevant to reviewers and maintainers.

    Code Coverage

    For detailed information about the code coverage, see the test coverage report.

    Reviews

    See the guideline for information on the review process. A summary of reviews will appear here.

  4. DrahtBot added the label Wallet on Sep 16, 2024
  5. jonatack commented at 9:48 pm on September 16, 2024: member
    See #26990.
  6. mzumsande commented at 9:57 pm on September 16, 2024: contributor

    See #26990.

    Is this related? My problem was that I was asked to provide a filename when in reality a wallet name or maybe directory name is expected. That PR seems to address a different issue?

  7. jonatack commented at 9:59 pm on September 16, 2024: member
    Yes, this is a duplicate of the first commit in #26990 (might be good to provide review feedback there).
  8. mzumsande commented at 10:39 pm on September 16, 2024: contributor
    How can it be a duplicate if it still says “filename” everywhere after the first commit of #26990? I mean I’m happy to close this trivial PR if #26990 wants to rename that too (if it’s correct to do so) but how can they be duplicates if they do different things?!
  9. jonatack commented at 11:03 pm on September 16, 2024: member
    As they both touch the same lines, I thought you may not have been aware of that pull and that the natural course of action would be to leave feedback there rather than both pulls proposing to improve the same message. If you disagree with that I apologize.
  10. mzumsande commented at 11:30 pm on September 16, 2024: contributor

    If you disagree with that I apologize.

    I wasn’t aware of the PR and actually agree with that, I just thought (already from the first comment) you wanted to say that the PRs are duplicates, as in addressing the same issue, which they are not.

  11. mzumsande closed this on Sep 16, 2024

  12. mzumsande deleted the branch on Sep 17, 2024

github-metadata-mirror

This is a metadata mirror of the GitHub repository bitcoin/bitcoin. This site is not affiliated with GitHub. Content is generated from a GitHub metadata backup.
generated: 2024-09-29 01:12 UTC

This site is hosted by @0xB10C
More mirrored repositories can be found on mirror.b10c.me