Using multiple wallet files with bitcoind #3113
issue ISibboI openend this issue on October 19, 2013-
ISibboI commented at 1:12 pm on October 19, 2013: noneIt should be possible to make bitcoind use multiple different wallet files without having to restart, so that public and private eWallet services don’t have to put everything into one big bucket. Especially for private eWallets, that’d be useful, because you can easily seperate which coins belong to which person without having to use a DB or something like that.
-
laanwj commented at 2:28 pm on October 19, 2013: member
There are some pull requests that implemented multi-wallet support, but they never made it because more work is needed. If you (or someone else) feel like picking this up, see:
-
super3 commented at 6:30 pm on October 21, 2013: contributorIf you are looking for this functionality, Bitcoin Armory has already implemented multiple wallets.
-
o-jasper commented at 9:39 pm on February 18, 2014: noneI second bitcoind and bitcoin-qt should support this. While at it, I suggest creation a few random inaccessible ones, which can be replaced with accesible ones. For plausible deniability that those wallets are actual ones in case of threat. (edit: maybe passwords should automatically try all the coin, so people cant whine about forgetting which wallet had which password..)
-
int03h commented at 0:39 am on February 19, 2014: noneBitcoin “the project” should be the blockchain. Wallets and all sorts of other stuff should be something else. I am fully aware that at the moment they are mashed together. They shouldn’t be. IMHO. –disable-wallet should be the default.
-
o-jasper commented at 2:43 pm on February 20, 2014: none
@ laanwj: I like that you try to modularize the project, but maybe people should be disuaded from using reference implementations as actual-use ones a bit?
At this point it probably doesnt hold back bitcoin at all. But for instance if there was some awesome transaction, like ‘kickstarter’. Which people were trying to popularize, it would be shame if the clients people use didnt support it. In such case, a list of scripts to recommend support for migh be a good idea.
Dont think the current scripting allows for something like kickstarter though!.. I do kindah hold that against some of the altcoins a bit, not at all innovating on transactions.(excepting ethereum, of course! but altcoins wouldnt have to go that far) The starting altcoins dont need to deal with a live blockchain, so they dont have much excuse..
-
laanwj added the label Wallet on Apr 29, 2014
-
laanwj added the label Feature on May 18, 2015
-
laanwj removed the label Improvement on May 18, 2015
-
laanwj removed the label Priority Medium on May 18, 2015
-
markasoftware commented at 6:34 pm on October 28, 2017: none@luke-jr what makes it bad to use a separate wallet for each user in a web wallet?
-
MarcoFalke closed this on Oct 28, 2017
-
fanquake moved this from the "Issues" to the "Done" column in a project
-
Bushstar referenced this in commit b2c6b48031 on Apr 8, 2020
-
MarcoFalke locked this on Sep 8, 2021
This is a metadata mirror of the GitHub repository bitcoin/bitcoin. This site is not affiliated with GitHub. Content is generated from a GitHub metadata backup.
generated: 2024-11-21 12:12 UTC
More mirrored repositories can be found on mirror.b10c.me