Fixing the blockchain security with 2FA verification itself #31432

issue phpkadir openend this issue on December 5, 2024
  1. phpkadir commented at 5:21 pm on December 5, 2024: none

    Please describe the feature you’d like to see added.

    I will describe bitcoins main security issue of wallets and its security standard 1/2^256 valid possiblity. if anybody or any organisation can successfully make a quantum or a photonic processor they can brute force wallets private keys and they can move the coins. they can lock the coins, they can cause transaction losses and bitcoin will be over. As blockchains nature coins are created from nothing and sent to the wallet address of miner and blockchain record wallet address and coin together. i recommend people to connect the receiving wallet address to transmitting wallet address of users. bitcoin user should add a bridge to double check and verify it by passing coins from their receiver wallet address and secondly transmitter wallet should transmit blockchain tx to bitcoin nodes. so receiver wallet addresses should be locked to only one transmitter address.

    to improve bitcoin what should add to bitcoin full node database transmitter wallet should be created first and receiver wallets should take first sats from it. master transmitter wallet should have a flag as master, master wallet should have ability to change and to create wallets with /master or /slave flags. in this point master address can make a buffer wallet and use it for sending bitcoins and it can hide behind One time Used wallet. transmitter wallet address should have random encoded nonce in its address.

    for example if somebody trying to brute force master(transmitter wallet) its record on blockchain will have nonce and this address will be seen as one of random fake addresses created using public key of master wallet.

    receiver wallets must use first transaction sender as a single valid tx address. receiver wallets should have slave flags. so we can align some wallets together with blockchain verified order.

    why this come to my mind? i am using 100+ bitcoin wallets and i need to check the balances etc daily. i want to make hierarchy for wallets.

    its not seem as a problem now but we need it for a better future.

    Describe the solution you’d like

    No response

    Describe any alternatives you’ve considered

    No response

    Please leave any additional context

    No response

  2. phpkadir added the label Feature on Dec 5, 2024
  3. pinheadmz commented at 5:26 pm on December 5, 2024: member
    This does not seem like a technical issue related to bitcoin core software directly and is probably better to have this discussion on other platforms. I’m going to close for now but you can add more comments if you can clarify a specific software issue or feature request
  4. pinheadmz closed this on Dec 5, 2024


github-metadata-mirror

This is a metadata mirror of the GitHub repository bitcoin/bitcoin. This site is not affiliated with GitHub. Content is generated from a GitHub metadata backup.
generated: 2024-12-21 15:12 UTC

This site is hosted by @0xB10C
More mirrored repositories can be found on mirror.b10c.me