fuzz: fuzz max_ret_len for DecodeBase58/DecodeBase58Check #31577

1. 
   brunoerg commented at 9:02 pm on December 27, 2024: contributor

   DecodeBase58 and DecodeBase58Check are fuzzed with a fixed value for max_ret_len (100). However, different values are used for this parameter depending on the usage (see key_io and unit tests).
2. fuzz: fuzz `max_ret_len` for `DecodeBase58`/`DecodeBase58Check`

   The value of `max_ret_len` is hardcoded (100). However, different
   values are used for this parameter depending on the usage.

   28187098c9
3. 
   DrahtBot commented at 9:02 pm on December 27, 2024: contributor

   The following sections might be updated with supplementary metadata relevant to reviewers and maintainers.

   Code Coverage & Benchmarks

   For details see: https://corecheck.dev/bitcoin/bitcoin/pulls/31577.

   Reviews

   See the guideline for information on the review process. A summary of reviews will appear here.

4. DrahtBot added the label Tests on Dec 27, 2024
5. 
   l0rinc commented at 9:12 pm on December 27, 2024: contributor

   Would it make sense to extend #30746 instead? Edit: extended a32002f (#30746) with this.
6. 
   brunoerg commented at 9:17 pm on December 27, 2024: contributor

   Would it make sense to extend #30746 instead?

   Feel free to cherry-pick this change there, then I close this one.

7. 
   l0rinc commented at 9:18 pm on December 27, 2024: contributor

   Moved the change over, added you as a co-author - thanks
8. brunoerg closed this on Dec 27, 2024

   ---

Contributors
brunoerg DrahtBot l0rinc

Labels
Tests