It’s sufficient to check only one test network, so this PR reverts the addition of testnet4 from #29775.
Testnet3 is deprecated. Instead of moving to testnet4, which might also be deprecated in the future, use signet.
This reverts the changes to test/functional/wallet_crosschain.py
in commit 74a04f9e7ad6a16988149cc3438b9ce13c91cdb9.
It's sufficient to check only one test network. The next commit
will change that network away from testnet3.
The following sections might be updated with supplementary metadata relevant to reviewers and maintainers.
For details see: https://corecheck.dev/bitcoin/bitcoin/pulls/32088.
See the guideline for information on the review process.
If your review is incorrectly listed, please react with 👎 to this comment and the bot will ignore it on the next update.
Reviewers, this pull request conflicts with the following ones:
If you consider this pull request important, please also help to review the conflicting pull requests. Ideally, start with the one that should be merged first.
Suggested by @maflcko in #31974 (review)
cc @fjahr
32-
33+ # Switch node 1 to signet before starting it.
34+ self.nodes[1].chain = 'signet'
35+ # Disable signet sync and prevent disk space warning on low resource CI
36+ self.nodes[1].extra_args = ['-maxconnections=0', '-prune=550']
37+ self.nodes[1].replace_in_config([('regtest=', 'signet='), ('[regtest]', '[signet]')])
0 # Switch node 1 to any network different from regtest before starting it.
1 self.nodes[1].chain = 'signet'
2 # Disable network sync and prevent disk space warning on low resource CI
3 self.nodes[1].extra_args = ['-maxconnections=0', '-prune=550']
4 self.nodes[1].replace_in_config([('regtest=', 'signet='), ('[regtest]', '[signet]')])
nit in 213abf5f1ce9f0242d83e57f29eb696c9e77e755:
Could keep it a bit more general to reduce the churn in the future and document that the exact network doesn’t matter.
Testnet3 is deprecated. Instead of moving to testnet4, which might
also be deprecated in the future, use signet.
utACK cec14ee47d71d8dd5ca8f90b760d807c3c8933a5
Looks good to me and CI failure seems unrelated.
lgtm ACK cec14ee47d71d8dd5ca8f90b760d807c3c8933a5 🌰
Signature:
0untrusted comment: signature from minisign secret key on empty file; verify via: minisign -Vm "${path_to_any_empty_file}" -P RWTRmVTMeKV5noAMqVlsMugDDCyyTSbA3Re5AkUrhvLVln0tSaFWglOw -x "${path_to_this_whole_four_line_signature_blob}"
1RUTRmVTMeKV5npGrKx1nqXCw5zeVHdtdYURB/KlyA/LMFgpNCs+SkW9a8N95d+U4AP1RJMi+krxU1A3Yux4bpwZNLvVBKy0wLgM=
2trusted comment: lgtm ACK cec14ee47d71d8dd5ca8f90b760d807c3c8933a5 🌰
3iqu9IGhZIYCH5/fECsfNjQWDPcecCY4hNA35+l+ULB7hMy8C0lv2/ixqc+YxXPTgUP6shALuRoVbRIZ3Bf5CCg==