BIP 72 was changed to save six bytes in bitcoin: URIs.
I updated the Handy Dandy Payment Request Generator page at https://bitcoincore.org/~gavin/createpaymentrequest.php and run a couple of -testnet tests.
BIP 72 was changed to save six bytes in bitcoin: URIs.
I updated the Handy Dandy Payment Request Generator page at https://bitcoincore.org/~gavin/createpaymentrequest.php and run a couple of -testnet tests.
BIP 72 was changed to save six bytes in bitcoin: URIs.
Automatic sanity-testing: PASSED, see http://jenkins.bluematt.me/pull-tester/1e01f7c506af60012bb99ced053d98eb529eda61 for binaries and test log. This test script verifies pulls every time they are updated. It, however, dies sometimes and fails to test properly. If you are waiting on a test, please check timestamps to verify that the test.log is moving at http://jenkins.bluematt.me/pull-tester/current/ Contact BlueMatt on freenode if something looks broken.
I'm ok with the change. But shouldn't we remain compatible with the request= syntax, in case people have started using that? Or is it still early enough?
No problem with it either...
We should also update the BIP here https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0072.mediawiki
If we intend the bips repo to be the autoritative source of BIPs, the pages on the wiki should at least be made read-only, and ideally just links to the corresponding files in the bips repository.
That may warrant some morediscussion on the mailinglist first, though.
The original discussion on the mailing list that led to creation of the repository was here: