doc: fix double-word typos in comments #34183

pull bensig wants to merge 1 commits into bitcoin:master from bensig:fix-double-word-typos changing 5 files +5 −5

bensig commented at 8:17 PM on December 30, 2025: contributor
Spotted a few duplicated words while reading through the code:
1. "the the" in mempool_stress.cpp
2. "to to" in txgraph.cpp
3. "for for" in cluster_linearize.h
4. "that that" in txrequest.h
5. "in in" in test/fuzz/txgraph.cpp
doc: fix double-word typos in comments 08ed802bab
DrahtBot added the label Docs on Dec 30, 2025
DrahtBot commented at 8:17 PM on December 30, 2025: contributor



The following sections might be updated with supplementary metadata relevant to reviewers and maintainers.



Code Coverage & Benchmarks

For details see: https://corecheck.dev/bitcoin/bitcoin/pulls/34183.



Reviews

See the guideline for information on the review process.

Type Reviewers

ACK l0rinc, maflcko

If your review is incorrectly listed, please copy-paste <code></code> into the comment that the bot should ignore.
l0rinc commented at 8:48 PM on December 30, 2025: contributor

We don't usually add these separately - they take up review time, which is already very scarce - but we might as well get rid of these. ACK 08ed802babb5cdda6fa61c4e50a0e6fb92a6f434
maflcko commented at 9:53 AM on December 31, 2025: member

lgtm ACK 08ed802babb5cdda6fa61c4e50a0e6fb92a6f434
fanquake merged this on Dec 31, 2025
fanquake closed this on Dec 31, 2025

Type	Reviewers
ACK	l0rinc, maflcko

in src/txrequest.h:28 in 08ed802bab

  24 | @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@
  25 |   * - Which peer announced it (through their NodeId)
  26 |   * - The txid or wtxid of the transaction (collectively called "txhash" in what follows)
  27 |   * - Whether it was a tx or wtx announcement (see BIP339).
  28 | - * - What the earliest permitted time is that that transaction can be requested from that peer (called "reqtime").
  29 | + * - What the earliest permitted time is that the transaction can be requested from that peer (called "reqtime").

billymcbip commented at 11:12 AM on December 31, 2025:

nit: I suggest making it even more concise: The earliest permissible request time for that transaction from that peer ("reqtime").

bensig commented at 6:46 PM on January 5, 2026:

That would have been even better.

Contributors

Labels

doc: fix double-word typos in comments #34183

Code Coverage & Benchmarks

Reviews