ci: Run feature_unsupported_utxo_db.py on Windows #34240

1. 
   maflcko commented at 3:45 pm on January 9, 2026: member

   The feature_unsupported_utxo_db.py test is skipped on Windows, because the ancient exe used in the test does not support UTF-8.

   One way to fix this could be to rework the test_runner to supply an ASCII temp dir. However, this is tedious and probably not worth it for a test that is close to being deleted: The test only checks that a -reindex-chainstate is sufficient, but at this point, it seems fine to accept users having to go through a full -reindex, or even full re-download.

   I am not deleting it just yet, because it is still minimally useful: E.g. #31674 (comment). Though, I think the next time an issue pops up with this test, it can be considered for deletion.

2. qa: Require `--exclude` for each excluded test

   Co-authored-by: Lőrinc <pap.lorinc@gmail.com>

   c5825d4b7f
3. Merge commit 'c5825d4b7fe9ae202ea3c74798f58cd3a920821d' into HEAD 371c886479
4. ci: Run feature_unsupported_utxo_db.py on Windows 671303af2e
5. DrahtBot renamed this:
   ci: Run feature_unsupported_utxo_db.py on Windows
   ci: Run feature_unsupported_utxo_db.py on Windows
   on Jan 9, 2026
6. DrahtBot added the label Tests on Jan 9, 2026
7. 
   DrahtBot commented at 3:45 pm on January 9, 2026: contributor

   The following sections might be updated with supplementary metadata relevant to reviewers and maintainers.

   Code Coverage & Benchmarks

   For details see: https://corecheck.dev/bitcoin/bitcoin/pulls/34240.

   Reviews

   See the guideline for information on the review process.

   Type	Reviewers
   Approach ACK	hebasto

   If your review is incorrectly listed, please copy-paste <!–meta-tag:bot-skip–> into the comment that the bot should ignore.

   Conflicts

   Reviewers, this pull request conflicts with the following ones:

   • #31410 (qa: Fix wallet_multiwallet.py by hebasto)

   If you consider this pull request important, please also help to review the conflicting pull requests. Ideally, start with the one that should be merged first.

8. 
   maflcko commented at 3:46 pm on January 9, 2026: member

   Draft, Based on #34168 to avoid more conflicts

   (will rebase once that is merged)

9. 
   hebasto commented at 4:10 pm on January 9, 2026: member

   Concept and Approach ACK.

Contributors
maflcko DrahtBot hebasto

Labels
Tests