This was written to add clarity to the situation around BIP-110 with regard to Core users given the possibilities around chainsplits come August.
Responsible disclosure of AI use: AI was used to outline the document, though everything in it has been iterated upon by a human (me) who is happy to sign off on everything within it.
♻️ Automatically closing for now based on heuristics. Please leave a comment, if this was erroneous. Generally, please focus on creating high-quality, original content that demonstrates a clear understanding of the project's requirements and goals.
📝 Moderators: If this is spam, please replace the title with ., so that the thread does not appear in
search results.
<!--e57a25ab6845829454e8d69fc972939a-->
The following sections might be updated with supplementary metadata relevant to reviewers and maintainers.
<!--006a51241073e994b41acfe9ec718e94-->
For details see: https://corecheck.dev/bitcoin/bitcoin/pulls/35259.
<!--021abf342d371248e50ceaed478a90ca-->
See the guideline for information on the review process. A summary of reviews will appear here.
<!--5faf32d7da4f0f540f40219e4f7537a3-->
I don't think it's reasonable to dismiss this as spam. There isn't any harm informing users of the various scenarios that can occur with regard to softforks if Core doesn't enforce their rules.
The goal is simply that users have more information with which to make decisions.