Demo merge of libsecp256k1 and deterministic signing #5257

pull sipa wants to merge 17 commits into bitcoin:master from sipa:secpmerge changing 86 files +8245 −421

sipa commented at 1:33 PM on November 10, 2014: member

Includes #5256, #5227 and #5220.

Do signature-s negation inside the tests

To avoid the need for libsecp256k1 to expose such functionality.

11d3b9939c

Squashed 'src/secp256k1/' content from commit ef6f677

git-subtree-dir: src/secp256k1
git-subtree-split: ef6f677679d7c2a5ba7d3ad85da0456a1d086a3e

a4d66b1c24

Delete src/secp256k1 before import dc721adcbe
Merge commit 'a4d66b1c24c601191bfb13c34bd759767c05b10b' as 'src/secp256k1' ac0aba4193
Always build and link libsecp256k1 7743fe10bd
Do not use EC code in global constructors 35e31ddd03
Use libsecp256k1 in key.cpp 42fb098e9e
Don't use bashisms in configure 29a97ec60a
depends: add gmp package 594b207d86
depends: quit exporting in config.site c64b808d45
build: fixup configure to not export anything e1ac0f84fa
build: secp256k1 as a subdir, since it's required ee832650da

revert part of 9eda1620b

This probably would've broken native OSX builds

25863020bc

Split up crypto/sha2 ac869ede0a
Add HMAC-SHA256 db040b6cba
Add the RFC6979 PRNG 9031be743f
Deterministic signing b307558319
sipa commented at 1:37 PM on November 10, 2014: member

This is just to show that libsecp256k1's deterministic signing (#5220) and the OpenSSL-based deterministic signing (#5227) are compatible with eachother, so switching between them will not change the signatures produced (and the tests from #5227 remain useful).
sipa renamed this:
~~Demo merge of libsecp256k1 and determinsitic signing~~
Demo merge of libsecp256k1 and deterministic signing
on Nov 10, 2014
laanwj added the label Wallet on Nov 10, 2014
sipa commented at 11:47 AM on November 12, 2014: member

Closing this as I'm not going to keep both #5220 and this one up to date. I'll rebase #5220 and #5227 as necessary.
sipa closed this on Nov 12, 2014
MarcoFalke locked this on Sep 8, 2021

Contributors

Labels