Before 0.10 release cleanup source with clang-style-script #5377

issue Diapolo opened this issue on November 26, 2014
  1. Diapolo commented at 2:30 PM on November 26, 2014: none

    I've been told that is the right thing to do and would like to remind for it :).

  2. jonasschnelli commented at 1:53 PM on November 27, 2014: contributor

    @Diapolo: so you mean automatically reformat all .cpp source files?

  3. sipa commented at 2:19 PM on November 27, 2014: member

    @jonasschnelli The plan has been for a while to apply clang-format to the whole source tree before the 0.10 release.

  4. jonasschnelli commented at 3:28 PM on November 27, 2014: contributor

    If help is wished I could create a patch or supply a script.

    I know others have other opinions (I've mentions this some months ago): I still like libcurls (cURL) way of blocking wrong code style by including a code-formatting check into the make check process.

  5. laanwj commented at 3:47 PM on November 27, 2014: member

    It's more of a matter of when.

    Most of the big changes for 0.10 have gone in, apart from Deterministic Signing mostly small stuff left in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pulls?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Apr+milestone%3A0.10.0 .

    So if we're going to do this, I think now would be a good time as any.

    NACK on including a code-formatting check in the make check process and/or travis tests. Tests should check only correctness. I don't want people to bogged down in silly bureaucracy (and have to install Yet Another Tool) before they can propose changes. If we want to be compulsive about this we could do it while merging I suppose...

  6. sipa commented at 4:50 PM on November 27, 2014: member

    See #5387.

  7. Diapolo commented at 5:39 AM on June 15, 2015: none

    Ping, what's up with this?

  8. paveljanik commented at 7:48 PM on October 1, 2015: contributor

    Close this?

  9. MarcoFalke commented at 2:27 PM on October 8, 2015: member

    Or rebase #5387?

  10. Diapolo commented at 7:23 AM on October 9, 2015: none

    There needs something to be done, I don't and never will be understanding, why this can be such a problem...

  11. jonasschnelli commented at 8:15 AM on October 9, 2015: contributor

    @Diapolo: Pleas read #5387 (comment). No need to post such comments.

  12. Diapolo closed this on Oct 31, 2015

  13. MarcoFalke locked this on Sep 8, 2021

github-metadata-mirror

This is a metadata mirror of the GitHub repository bitcoin/bitcoin. This site is not affiliated with GitHub. Content is generated from a GitHub metadata backup.
generated: 2026-04-21 18:15 UTC

This site is hosted by @0xB10C
More mirrored repositories can be found on mirror.b10c.me