WIP: force zeromq to work with static linking+mingw #6819
pull theuni wants to merge 1 commits into bitcoin:master from theuni:zeromq-mingw changing 5 files +43 −3-
theuni commented at 5:16 pm on October 13, 2015: memberI have no idea if this actually works, it’s only meant to be enough link a binary. This needs a good bit of testing on Windows before merge.
-
theuni commented at 5:16 pm on October 13, 2015: memberping @jmcorgan @jonasschnelli
-
build: force zeromq to work with static linking+mingw
I have no idea if this actually works, it's only meant to be enough link a binary.
-
luke-jr commented at 5:22 pm on October 13, 2015: memberWhat? Why? Static linking makes sense for the Linux binaries, but not for Mac/Windows. It certainly shouldn’t break non-static builds either way!
-
theuni commented at 5:23 pm on October 13, 2015: member
as mentioned on IRC, the zmq rpc tests currently yield:
0Running testscript zmq_test.py... 1Initializing test directory /tmp/ramfs/tmp/testnnj2Pf 2Assertion failed! 3 4Program: Z:\home\cory\dev\bitcoin2\src\bitcoind.exe 5File: zmq/zmqpublishnotifier.cpp, Line 91 6 7Expression: psocket 8 9abnormal program termination
With that assertion removed, it (appears to) finish successfully.
-
luke-jr commented at 5:25 pm on October 13, 2015: memberI don’t see how that is at all related to this PR…
-
luke-jr commented at 5:30 pm on October 13, 2015: memberBut that assertion/problem seems entirely unrelated to static linking…?
-
jonasschnelli commented at 6:28 pm on October 13, 2015: contributorNice! Concept ACK.
-
laanwj commented at 11:00 am on October 15, 2015: member
Static linking makes sense for the Linux binaries, but not for Mac/Windows
We link all dependency libraries statically on Windows and Mac as well as Linux. On no platform do we actually perform a ‘static build’ as this would mess with ASLR…
-
laanwj added the label Build system on Oct 20, 2015
-
laanwj commented at 6:29 am on November 2, 2015: memberAny progress here?
-
laanwj commented at 9:55 am on December 3, 2015: memberDoes this have to be solved before the 0.12 release?
-
theuni commented at 4:50 am on December 4, 2015: member
I’m not familiar enough with zmq to know how helpful it is in Windows. My hunch is that the overlap would be small enough to ignore until someone willing/able to test comes along.
I’d rather that than blindly enable it and risk untested codepaths.
-
laanwj commented at 8:50 am on December 4, 2015: member
OK, yes, zmq on windows doesn’t seem like a very common use-case. Thanks for the explanation.
(I’m not even convinced it should be enabled in any releases by default, I mean it has to statically link zmq instead of use the one on the system, which may be incompatible in practice)
-
laanwj commented at 2:55 pm on January 22, 2016: memberClosing this for now, as it seems to be inactive. Let me know if you start work on this again so I can reopen.
-
laanwj closed this on Feb 3, 2016
-
MarcoFalke locked this on Sep 8, 2021
This is a metadata mirror of the GitHub repository bitcoin/bitcoin. This site is not affiliated with GitHub. Content is generated from a GitHub metadata backup.
generated: 2024-11-17 18:12 UTC
More mirrored repositories can be found on mirror.b10c.me