433 | @@ -434,7 +434,7 @@ std::string HelpMessage(HelpMessageMode mode)
434 | strUsage += HelpMessageOpt("-limitdescendantcount=<n>", strprintf("Do not accept transactions if any ancestor would have <n> or more in-mempool descendants (default: %u)", DEFAULT_DESCENDANT_LIMIT));
435 | strUsage += HelpMessageOpt("-limitdescendantsize=<n>", strprintf("Do not accept transactions if any ancestor would have more than <n> kilobytes of in-mempool descendants (default: %u).", DEFAULT_DESCENDANT_SIZE_LIMIT));
436 | }
437 | - string debugCategories = "addrman, alert, bench, coindb, db, lock, rand, rpc, selectcoins, mempool, mempoolrej, net, proxy, prune, http, libevent"; // Don't translate these and qt below
438 | + string debugCategories = "addrman, alert, bench, coindb, db, lock, rand, rpc, selectcoins, mempool, mempoolrej, net, proxy, prune, http, libevent, zmq"; // Don't translate these and qt below
439 | if (mode == HMM_BITCOIN_QT)
Do you think the zmq system merits its own debug category? It's really the the first instance of a "notification" system, which might include other methods in the future.
It's not that big a deal; just double checking if this is the right way to go.
@jmcorgan this is already the case, I'm just exposing what is already there.
If you want rename it to notifications:, sure.
These messages are helpful when debugging, absolutely.
@jmcorgan IMO it does. I think it's good to have different modules use a different debug category, even if they belong to the same logical grouping. Debugging is either very targeted 'I want to see this debug message' or 'I want to see all debugging messages', rarely in between.