Compare against the scriptnum from Bitcoin Core 0.10 instead of OpenSSL's BN.
Closes #7086.
Compare against the scriptnum from Bitcoin Core 0.10 instead of OpenSSL.
Closes #7086.
Right, I didn't update the makefile at all, should pass now.
ut ACK. I didn't verify that this move-only-ish from 0.10.
concept ACK, once-over utACK , doesn't look like a move only. Functions were [at least] re-ordered hence the rename diff wasn't suppressed.
not a move only
Strange - I copied CScriptNum10 exactly from the 0.10 branch. The only change should be the comment and rename. There should have been no reordering.
Can confirm all the code in https://github.com/laanwj/bitcoin/blob/4ec3561eb3473638230ef780b41343bc6284b460/src/test/scriptnum10.h is taken from the .10 branch.
taken from the .10 branch.
My fault, I was comparing against the current src/test/bignum.h.
Striked my comment above.