The first commit fixes #7035 (comment)
The second commit was on my list to fix before 0.12 but I somehow forgot it. People complain about this at transifex.
The first commit fixes #7035 (comment)
The second commit was on my list to fix before 0.12 but I somehow forgot it. People complain about this at transifex.
1152 | @@ -1153,7 +1153,7 @@ 1153 | </message> 1154 | <message> 1155 | <location line="+1"/> 1156 | - <source>Reset all settings changes made over the GUI</source>
Is the former (current) not more clear what -resetguisettings does?
What about
Reset all settings changed in the GUI
Reset all settings changed in the GUI
Yes. This would be better IMO.
Force pushed.
ACK fa5769e95a44427e1ed7d63795d4ff60985f0059 (no backport because of transiflex).
no backport
No opinion on this but this could be merged into 0.12 without rebase. Is there a translation update before the final release?
No opinion on this but this could be merged into 0.12 without rebase. Is there a translation update before the final release?
According to @laanwj, string freezing was done in 2015-12-01 (http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-September/011182.html). People already translated 0.12er strings (https://www.transifex.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/qt-translation-012x/).
Will pull translation from transifex a few times before the final 0.12 release, but it's too late to change strings.
617 | @@ -618,7 +618,7 @@ void TorController::disconnected_cb(TorControlConnection& conn) 618 | if (!reconnect) 619 | return; 620 | 621 | - LogPrint("tor", "tor: Disconnected from Tor control port %s, trying to reconnect\n", target); 622 | + LogPrint("tor", "tor: Not connected to Tor control port %s, trying to reconnect\n", target);
I'm confused. Didn't this get in in a previous change?
Oh I thought he fixed that...
Ok then, let's not do a backport.