segnet: bitcoin-qt does not show correct amounts in transaction history #7407

nomnombtc commented at 7:31 PM on January 24, 2016: contributor

Hello,

not sure this is the right place to report it, but in github.com/sipa/bitcoin there is no "issues" section.

If I send something on segnet, it only seems to show the transaction fee in the gui. See screenshot: https://i.imgur.com/t00uMKD.png https://segnet.metaco.com/transactions/0b1f74319681a13f46d696329e838cc8ac0295aeb77df6afb0a081420ebaf65c

laanwj added the label GUI on Jan 25, 2016

laanwj commented at 4:23 PM on January 25, 2016: member

Not sure either what is the right place for this @sipa?

bityogi commented at 7:21 PM on January 25, 2016: none

For mere mortals like me who are trying to keep up with all the development happening in bitcoin, my suggestion would be to keep it all here.

Segregated Witness is an important part of the road-map that core has adopted and everyone following this development can be kept in the loop more easily right here.

MarcoFalke commented at 9:07 PM on January 25, 2016: member

Imo it is reasonable to collect issues for segwit code considering that it is planned to merge soon™.

In any case, I don't think @sipa will address GUI-only related issues, so another reason to have them here. @nomnombtc Could you also post getrawtransaction $ or decoderawtransaction $?

nomnombtc commented at 10:22 PM on January 25, 2016: contributor

Sure no problem, here is getrawtransaction:

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

I think it is just a display issue, if I do bitcoin-cli -segnet listtransactions it seems fine.

laanwj added the label Feature on Feb 16, 2016

jonasschnelli commented at 8:26 AM on June 21, 2016: contributor

@nomnombtc: Mind doing a retest of this "bug" with the newest segwit PR?

nomnombtc commented at 7:27 AM on June 22, 2016: contributor

@jonasschnelli Hello. I tried it again with a built from: https://github.com/sipa/bitcoin/commits/segwit

I noticed this behaviour only happens if I send to an address from the same wallet.dat (Payment to yourself), in this case it only shows the transaction fee - maybe this is even expected behaviour? If that is the case, the "bug" can be closed and I am sorry for causing confusion :(

Receiving/Sending from/to external addresses seems to work just fine :+1:

Send to address from same wallet.dat:
Status: 6 confirmations
Date: 22 Jun 2016 08:33
Total debit: -0.80085000 BTC
Total credit: 0.80085000 BTC
Transaction fee: -0.00004520 BTC
Net amount: -0.00004520 BTC
Transaction ID: 1825f0ef7def1f74d2dd136039ad1695cab458fe60ac13959d98894304e1368a-000

Send to external address:
Status: 4/unconfirmed, broadcast through 1 node(s)
Date: 22 Jun 2016 08:52
To: externaladdress D9drvKYD9S2QtbAsdL43VY8CeqLWheY7Rq
Debit: -0.80085000 BTC
Transaction fee: -0.00007460 BTC
Net amount: -0.80092460 BTC
Transaction ID: 0704c365980642d9addeaa034b91d2af331b2abd37a2fc3a4481ad78fde61557-000

sipa commented at 9:21 AM on June 22, 2016: member

That's the correct behaviour. The 'transaction' ledger entries in the GUI show the net effect of each transaction on your wallet, not the total amount moved.

nomnombtc commented at 11:47 AM on June 22, 2016: contributor

Ok thank you for explaining, I've used bitcoin-qt a lot in the past but didn't know it does this :) Really thought I had found some bug there hmm ... closing here then, sorry for confusion.

nomnombtc closed this on Jun 22, 2016

MarcoFalke locked this on Sep 8, 2021