In section rpc-low-level-api-changes there is no reference to, for instance, fundrawtransaction.
Missing new RPC calls in 0.12 release notes #7516
issue promag opened this issue on February 11, 2016-
promag commented at 3:38 PM on February 11, 2016: member
-
laanwj commented at 3:52 PM on February 11, 2016: member
Probably more than one:
<sipa> list of all new RPCs: disconnectnode, setban, listbanned, clearbanned, getblockheader, fundrawtransaction, estimatesmartfee, estimatesmartpriority, abandontransaction, importpubkey - laanwj added the label Docs and Output on Feb 11, 2016
- promag renamed this:
Missing fundrawtransaction in 0.12 release notes
Missing new RPC calls in 0.12 release notes
on Feb 11, 2016 -
morcos commented at 12:53 PM on February 15, 2016: member
I'm happy to write up some stuff for estimatesmartfee, estimatesmartpriority and abandontransaction, but I thought I had gotten some feedback that we didn't necessarily want to announce these things. The first two because the API is still in flux, and I'd really like to announce abandontransaction, but some people objected because they don't think users should be doing that.
-
laanwj commented at 12:57 PM on February 15, 2016: member
Good point morcos.
It's not necessary to write a lot about them - the release notes are not a supplement for documentation, documentation should be found with
help <call>. But mentioning adding them under "Low-level RPC API changes" makes sense.If they're still experimental, one could add [EXPERIMENTAL] (same as Linux experimental features) or decide to withhold them from the notes completely, if that is an explicit choice and not just "we forgot".
-
watashikokoto commented at 1:44 PM on February 15, 2016: none
-
laanwj commented at 10:07 AM on February 18, 2016: member
Closing - 0.12.0 final has been tagged, no longer possible to make changes here
- laanwj closed this on Feb 18, 2016
-
ruimarinho commented at 1:08 AM on February 19, 2016: none
Just wanted to mention that when adding support for client libs even a small a reference for new or updated methods greatly improve this process.
-
sipa commented at 1:11 AM on February 19, 2016: member
The release notes for 0.12 can still be updated, but they're maintained in master now (as we won't touch the 0.12 branch anymore).
-
laanwj commented at 9:28 AM on February 19, 2016: member
Just wanted to mention that when adding support for client libs even a small a reference for new or updated methods greatly improve this process.
I agree. However, we cannot hold up the release because there are small open issues on the release notes. There was about a week time frame that someone could have picked this up.
(also, as @sipa says, the release notes could still be updated in master, see 0e3ccbfb26b11ea3d9ed7dfd39886d69097286e1. When I send out the release announcement mail I'll use the version from there)
- MarcoFalke locked this on Sep 8, 2021