I saw this here: https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Transaction_replacement And it doesn't really clarify if it got inserted into the official code or not. So did it?
(P.S. I think it's a bad idea but just wanted to know :) )
-
elichai commented at 6:36 PM on May 28, 2016: contributor
-
elichai commented at 6:42 PM on May 28, 2016: contributor
Is this what's inside the official code now? https://bitcoincore.org/en/faq/optin_rbf/
-
sipa commented at 6:44 PM on May 28, 2016: member
The wiki is (always) outdated.
Yes, transactions that explicitly indicate so are replaceable in the mempool in Bitcoin Core 0.12.0 and 0.12.1. See https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/3urm8o/optin_rbf_is_misunderstood_ask_questions_about_it/ and https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0125.mediawiki.
If you think it's a bad idea, that's fine; you don't need to use it.
- sipa closed this on May 28, 2016
-
elichai commented at 7:01 PM on May 28, 2016: contributor
Thank You, As you said someone should really update the wiki :) One thing I just didn't understood in the BIP is this line: `Inherited signaling: Transactions that don't explicitly signal replaceability are replaceable under this policy for as long as any one of their ancestors signals replaceability and remains unconfirmed.
Does it mean you can RBF a transaction without setting the nSequence to UNIT_MAX-1?
-
luke-jr commented at 8:21 PM on May 28, 2016: member
Feel free to update the wiki yourself...
- DrahtBot locked this on Sep 8, 2021
