the current block structure is : { blockheader vtx[] } the vtx[0] is include miner payout and miner pool information, can we take vtx[0] as a separate structure. { blockheader miner { pool info out ...... } vtx[] } what do you think of it?
-
LongShao007 commented at 5:03 AM on August 24, 2016: contributor
-
sipa commented at 5:30 AM on August 24, 2016: member
What are you trying to do?
On Aug 24, 2016 7:03 AM, "LongShao007" notifications@github.com wrote:
the current block structure is : { blockheader vtx[] } the vtx[0] is include miner payout and miner pool information, can we take vtx[0] as a separate structure. { blockheader miner { pool info out ...... } vtx[] } what do you think of it?
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub #8570, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAheiAfkftJzCOwM3br5pJqgfBgSrAjJks5qi9CXgaJpZM4Jro0x .
-
jonasschnelli commented at 6:33 AM on August 24, 2016: contributor
I think @LongShao007 is trying to add private data (or lets say mining pool data) in one of the core primitives (block).
This isn't the right place to discuss this. Please use the bitcoin-dev mailing list for consensus change proposals: https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
Closing.
- jonasschnelli closed this on Aug 24, 2016
-
LongShao007 commented at 7:18 AM on August 24, 2016: contributor
vtx[0] is special tx, vin used to add private data by some pool, so i think take vtx[0] as a single struture, it is better than vtx[0] as tx, i only want to talk about it with you!
- MarcoFalke locked this on Sep 8, 2021
Contributors